Jack Draper and Evan Furness will square off in the quarter of the Forli 4 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 6:30 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Draper is the pick to win this match.
Jack Draper -> 1.64
Evan Furness -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Draper vs. Evan Furness
This will be the 2nd time that Jack Draper and Evan Furness face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Draper (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Draper won 6-4 6-4 in the 2nd round in M25 Sunderland back in 2020.
Jack Draper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-13 | 9-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 17-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 201 (career-high), Draper got to the quarter after defeating Mirza Basic 6-2 6-2 and Quentin Halys 7-64 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Halys (7-64 6-4). During the match, Draper scored 73 points vs Halys’s 64. Draper was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Draper scored 9 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jack Draper was pretty effective on serve to win 86% (37/43) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Halys once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Draper has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 70% of his matches (116-50). 9-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Draper has an overall39-15 win-loss record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Forli 2 Challenger.
The Brit has an aggregate 9-2 win-loss record in 2022, 9-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 4 Challenger
Evan Furness
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-17 | 3-2 | 8-12 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-15 | 0-3 | 5-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-31 | 2-3 | 16-12 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-27 | 14-1 | 26-20 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 37-10 | 34-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 301, Furness reached the quarter after beating Jelle Sels 6-4 7-65, Alexander Ritschard 3-6 6-3 6-4, Antoine Hoang 7-65 7-64 and Mikael Torpegaard 6-1 4-3 ret..
In the 2nd round, Furness had a good straight sets win against Torpegaard (6-1 4-3 ret.). During the match Furness scored 47 points vs Torpegaard’s 25. Furness was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Furness recorded 7 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Evan Furness conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 76% of his first serves in, win 96% (25/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (3/8) on the 2nd serve. Furness broke Torpegaard 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Furness started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
Evan has an overall 12-6 win-loss record in 2022, 12-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Draper | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 91 |
| Pts | 138-107 | 288-257 |
| Total Points | 245 | 545 |
| Winners | 62 | 145 |
| %Winners | 45% | 50% |
Draper played 2 matches while Furness competed in 4 matches. Furness started his run from the qualifications while Draper had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Evan Furness conceded 1 set while Jack Draper hasn’t lost a set so far. Draper has played 6 set(s) less than Furness (4 vs 10). Therefore, Draper played 52 games less than Furness. The Brit scored 62 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Furness recorded 145 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Draper | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
| 1st in | 71/120 | 180/268 |
| %1st in | 59% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 62/71 | 145/180 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 27/49 | 42/88 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 48% |
Draper scored 16 aces (8 per match). Furness bagged 20 aces (5 per match). Draper won 87% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Furness won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Draper | Furness |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 10 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 10/18 |
| % Converted | 45% | 56% |
| Conceded | 5 | 16 |
| Saved | 5 | 11 |
| % Saved | 100% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Draper broke his opponents 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Jack very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. Evan broke his opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Draper | ||||
| R1 Basic |
R2 Halys |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 23 | 39 | |
| pts | 65-43 | 73-64 | 138-107 | |
| Total points | 108 | 137 | 245 | |
| Winners | 25 | 37 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 51% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 9 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 28/48 | 43/72 | 71/120 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 60% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 37/43 | 62/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 86% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 16/29 | 27/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 1/2 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 50% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Furness | ||||||
| Q1 Sels |
Q3 Ritschard |
R1 Hoang |
R2 Torpegaard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-65 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | 7-65 7-64 | 6-1 4-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 28 | 26 | 14 | 91 | |
| pts | 64-64 | 86-85 | 91-83 | 47-25 | 288-257 | |
| Total points | 128 | 171 | 174 | 72 | 545 | |
| Winners | 35 | 45 | 40 | 25 | 145 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 52% | 44% | 53% | 50% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 48/67 | 52/84 | 54/83 | 26/34 | 180/268 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 62% | 65% | 76% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 35/48 | 45/52 | 40/54 | 25/26 | 145/180 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 87% | 74% | 96% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/19 | 14/32 | 11/29 | 3/8 | 42/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 44% | 38% | 38% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 2/5 | 4/8 | 3/4 | 10/18 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 40% | 50% | 75% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 16 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 4/5 | 5/9 | 0/0 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 56% | – | 118% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWLL
LLWWLLLWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Robin HaaseHaase (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Evan FurnessFurness (1-0) – H2H and prediction
