Tim Van Rijthoven and Brayden Schnur will face off in the 2nd round of the Forli 4 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tim Van Rijthoven who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tim Van Rijthoven is the pick to win this match.
Tim Van Rijthoven -> 1.48
Brayden Schnur -> 2.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tim Van Rijthoven vs. Brayden Schnur
This will be the 2nd time that Tim Van Rijthoven and Brayden Schnur play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Schnur (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they locked horns, Schnur won 6-3 3-6 6-3 in the final in Canada F6 back in 2016.
Tim Van Rijthoven
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-24 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 25-15 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 37-22 | 13-7 | 7-6 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2020 | 8-8 | 3-2 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 236, Tim got to the 2nd round after defeating Christian Capacci 6-1 6-3, Zhizhen Zhang 6-3 7-63 and Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-2 7-61.
In the 1st round, Van Rijthoven had a good straight sets win against Uchiyama (6-2 7-61). During the match, Van Rijthoven scored 82 points vs Uchiyama’s 63. Van Rijthoven was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van Rijthoven recorded 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tim Van Rijthoven conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Van Rijthoven put 63% of his first serves in, winning 81% (42/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (13/30) on the 2nd serve. Van Rijthoven was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Uchiyama twice.
Van Rijthoven has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (203-115). 8-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Van Rijthoven has a composed61-34 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Van Rijthoven has a compiled 10-4 win-loss record in 2022, 8-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 4 Challenger
Brayden Schnur
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 3-8 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-30 | 5-11 | 6-8 | 11-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-15 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
2019 | 37-32 | 20-20 | 0-0 | 14-6 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 237, Brayden got to the 2nd round after defeating Matteo Gigante 6-4 3-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Canadian defeated Gigante (6-4 3-6 6-1). During the match Schnur scored 85 points vs Gigante’s 75. Brayden was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Schnur blasted 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Brayden Schnur lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Schnur put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (35/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the 2nd serve. Brayden broke Gigante 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Canadian has an aggregate 1-4 win-loss record in 2022, 1-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Van Rijthoven | Schnur |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 6 | 3 |
Tot Games | 59 | 26 |
Pts | 211-156 | 85-75 |
Total Points | 367 | 160 |
Winners | 109 | 35 |
%Winners | 52% | 41% |
Van Rijthoven played 3 matches while Schnur competed in 1 match. Van Rijthoven started his run from the qualifications while Schnur had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Brayden Schnur dropped 1 set while Tim Van Rijthoven hasn’t dropped a set so far. Van Rijthoven has played 3 sets more than Schnur (6 vs 3). Therefore, Van Rijthoven played 33 games more than Schnur. Van Rijthoven scored 109 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Schnur managed to score 35 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Van Rijthoven | Schnur |
---|---|---|
Aces | 30 | 4 |
Avg per match | 10 | 4 |
1st in | 132/192 | 52/79 |
%1st in | 69% | 66% |
1st pts | 109/132 | 35/52 |
%1st pts | 83% | 67% |
2nd pts | 30/60 | 17/27 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 63% |
Van Rijthoven struck 30 aces (10 per match). Schnur managed to score 4 aces . Van Rijthoven won 83% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Schnur won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Van Rijthoven | Schnur |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 4 |
Converted | 7/11 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 64% | 44% |
Conceded | 7 | 7 |
Saved | 7 | 5 |
% Saved | 100% | 71% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Van Rijthoven very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 7 break points. Brayden broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Canadian conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Van Rijthoven | |||||
Q1 Capacci |
Q3 Zhang |
R1 Uchiyama |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-3 7-63 | 6-2 7-61 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 22 | 21 | 59 | |
pts | 60-34 | 69-59 | 82-63 | 211-156 | |
Total points | 94 | 128 | 145 | 367 | |
Winners | 27 | 40 | 42 | 109 | |
%Winners | 45% | 58% | 51% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 8 | 11 | 11 | 30 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |
1st in | 31/41 | 49/69 | 52/82 | 132/192 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 71% | 63% | 69% | |
1st pts | 27/31 | 40/49 | 42/52 | 109/132 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 82% | 81% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 6/10 | 11/20 | 13/30 | 30/60 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 55% | 43% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 1/3 | 2/2 | 7/11 | |
Converted % | 67% | 33% | 100% | 64% | |
Conceded | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 6/6 | 7 | |
Saved % | – | 100% | 100% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Schnur | |||||
R1 Gigante |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | ||||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |||
pts | 85-75 | 85-75 | |||
Total points | 160 | 160 | |||
Winners | 35 | 35 | |||
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |||
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
1st in | 52/79 | 52/79 | |||
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |||
1st pts | 35/52 | 35/52 | |||
% 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |||
2nd pts | 17/27 | 17/27 | |||
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | |||
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |||
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |||
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |||
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |||
Saved % | 71% | 24% | |||
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Forli 4 Challenger
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jack DraperDraper – Quentin HalysHalys (7-64 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-1 3-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Maximilian MartererMarterer (5-7 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Robin HaaseHaase (0-0) – H2H and prediction