Quentin Halys and Jack Draper will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Forli 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quentin Halys who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Quentin Halys is the pick to win this match.
Quentin Halys -> 1.84
Jack Draper -> 1.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Jack Draper
There is no head to head record between Quentin Halys and Jack Draper since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Quentin Halys
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 18-16 | 3-5 | 7-8 | 5-3 | 3-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-26 | 11-13 | 10-6 | 3-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 57-26 | 5-7 | 9-4 | 32-10 | 6-5 | 5-0 |
2021 | 35-27 | 14-8 | 10-9 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
2020 | 13-18 | 3-2 | 2-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 137, the French player got to the 2nd round after defeating Vitaliy Sachko 6-1 7-63.
In the 1st round, Quentin had a good straight sets win against Sachko (6-1 7-63). During the match, Halys scored 70 points vs Sachko’s 46. Halys was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Halys blasted 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Quentin Halys was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (36/46) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The French player was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Sachko 3 times.
Halys has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (283-234). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Halys has an overall 94-76 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The French player best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Forli 3 Challenger.
Quentin has a compiled 10-5 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 4 Challenger
Jack Draper
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-13 | 9-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
2020 | 17-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 201 (career-high), Draper reached the 2nd round after defeating Mirza Basic 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Jack had a good straight sets win against Basic (6-2 6-2). During the match Draper scored 65 points vs Basic’s 43. Jack was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Draper recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jack Draper was extremely effective on serve to win 89% (25/28) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Basic 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Jack’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Forli 2 Challenger.
Jack has an overall 8-2 win-loss record in 2022, 8-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Halys | Draper |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
Pts | 70-46 | 65-43 |
Total Points | 116 | 108 |
Winners | 36 | 25 |
%Winners | 51% | 38% |
Both Halys and Draper played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Halys and Draper have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Halys played 4 games more than Draper. Quentin scored 36 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit made 25 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Halys | Draper |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 7 |
Avg per match | 9 | 7 |
1st in | 46/63 | 28/48 |
%1st in | 73% | 58% |
1st pts | 36/46 | 25/28 |
%1st pts | 78% | 89% |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 11/20 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 55% |
Halys scored 9 aces . Draper recorded 7 aces . Halys won 78% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Halys | Draper |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/3 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 100% | 44% |
Conceded | 1 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 1 |
% Saved | 0% | 100% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Halys conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Jack broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Brit was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Halys | |||
R1 Sachko |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 70-46 | 70-46 | |
Total points | 116 | 116 | |
Winners | 36 | 36 | |
%Winners | 51% | 51% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 46/63 | 46/63 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
1st pts | 36/46 | 36/46 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Draper | |||
R1 Basic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 65-43 | 65-43 | |
Total points | 108 | 108 | |
Winners | 25 | 25 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 28/48 | 28/48 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Forli 4 Challenger
- Emilio NavaNava – Zsombor PirosPiros (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-2 7-61) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Mirza BasicBasic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Gastao EliasElias (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Antoine HoangHoang (7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Joao DominguesDomingues (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-75 6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-4 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Gastao EliasElias (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Zsombor PirosPiros (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (7-6(2) 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Robin HaaseHaase (0-0) – H2H and prediction