Zsombor Piros and Emilio Nava will face off in the 1st round of the Forli 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 5:00 pm on GENCOM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.33
Emilio Nava -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Zsombor Piros and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Zsombor Piros
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-16 | 1-4 | 7-10 | 7-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-2 | 1-1 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 257, Piros reached the 1st round after beating Mohamed Safwat 6-3 6-3 and Jonas Forejtek 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Piros had a good straight sets win against Forejtek (6-1 6-3). During the match, Piros scored 59 points vs Forejtek’s 44. Piros was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Piros struck 4 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Zsombor Piros was very effective on serve to win 86% (19/22) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Hungarian broke Forejtek 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zsombor started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Piros has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 65% of his matches (154-84). 8-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Piros has an aggregate24-13 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The Hungarian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Forli 1 Challenger and the Forli 2 Challenger.
Zsombor has a compiled 8-2 win-loss record in 2022, 8-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 4 Challenger
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-20 | 11-8 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 319, Emilio reached the 1st round after defeating Ulises Blanch 6-75 6-4 6-4 and Hiroki Moriya 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Moriya, Emilio recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Nava scored 87 points vs Moriya’s 81. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Nava fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Nava lost the serve 5 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Nava put 68% of his first serves in, winning 65% (34/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Moriya 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Nava has a compiled 6-2 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 61 |
| Pts | 128-99 | 208-190 |
| Total Points | 227 | 398 |
| Winners | 50 | 84 |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% |
Both Piros and Nava played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Emilio Nava conceded 2 sets while Zsombor Piros hasn’t dropped a set so far. Piros has played 2 set(s) less than Nava (4 vs 6). Therefore, Piros played 27 games less than Nava. Zsombor scored 50 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Nava blasted 84 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 59/103 | 113/183 |
| %1st in | 57% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 50/59 | 84/113 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 22/44 | 33/70 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 47% |
Piros recorded 10 aces (5 per match). Nava struck 13 aces (6.5 per match). Piros won 85% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 9 |
| Converted | 7/14 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 50% | 41% |
| Conceded | 1 | 13 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 54% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Piros broke his opponents 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Zsombor extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Nava broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 54% of the break points that he conceded.
| Piros | ||||
| Q1 Safwat |
Q3 Forejtek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 16 | 34 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 59-44 | 128-99 | |
| Total points | 124 | 103 | 227 | |
| Winners | 31 | 19 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 32% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 37/57 | 22/46 | 59/103 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 48% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 31/37 | 19/22 | 50/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 86% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 13/24 | 22/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 54% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 4/9 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 44% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nava | ||||
| Q1 Blanch |
Q3 Moriya |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-4 | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 28 | 61 | |
| pts | 121-109 | 87-81 | 208-190 | |
| Total points | 230 | 168 | 398 | |
| Winners | 50 | 34 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 61/106 | 52/77 | 113/183 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 68% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 50/61 | 34/52 | 84/113 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 65% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 10/25 | 33/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 40% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 6/11 | 9/22 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 55% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 2/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 29% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLLLWW
LLWLLWLLLW Tennis Scores in Forli 4 Challenger
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-4 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-75 6-4 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Joao DominguesDomingues (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Antoine HoangHoang (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
