Hiroki Moriya and Emilio Nava will square off in the qualifications of the Forli 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Nava who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Nava is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Nava -> 1.88
Hiroki Moriya -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hiroki Moriya vs. Emilio Nava
There is no head to head record between Hiroki Moriya and Emilio Nava since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Hiroki Moriya
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-18 | 19-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-28 | 31-27 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-30 | 18-19 | 0-0 | 7-9 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 22-28 | 13-17 | 0-0 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 7-15 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 271, Hiroki got to the qualifications after defeating Adrian Menendez-Maceiras 2-6 7-62 6-1.
In the qualifications against Menendez-Maceiras, Moriya recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-62 6-1). During the match, Moriya scored 111 points vs Menendez-Maceiras’s 100. Moriya was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Moriya scored 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Hiroki Moriya lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Moriya put 57% of his first serves in, winning 67% (34/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Menendez-Maceiras 5 times after converting 26% of his break points (5/19).
Moriya has a unfavourable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won only 48% of his matches (254-274). 6-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. . In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Moriya has an aggregate 38-42 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Moriya’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Quimper Challenger.
The Japanese has a composed 6-2 win-loss record in 2022, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 4 Challenger
Emilio Nava
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-20 | 11-8 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-31 | 24-14 | 12-8 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-27 | 15-15 | 14-6 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-16 | 9-6 | 27-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 10-7 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 319, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Ulises Blanch 6-75 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Blanch, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-4 6-4). During the match Nava scored 121 points vs Blanch’s 109. Nava was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Nava struck 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Emilio Nava was pretty effective on serve to win 82% (50/61) of his 1st serve and 51% (23/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Emilio broke Blanch 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Nava has an overall 5-2 win-loss record in 2022, 5-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moriya | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 33 |
| Pts | 111-100 | 121-109 |
| Total Points | 211 | 230 |
| Winners | 34 | 50 |
| %Winners | 31% | 41% |
Both Moriya and Nava played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Hiroki Moriya conceded 1 set, while Emilio Nava surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Moriya and Nava have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Moriya played 5 games less than Nava. Hiroki scored 34 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Emilio recorded 50 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moriya | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 7 |
| 1st in | 51/89 | 61/106 |
| %1st in | 57% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 34/51 | 50/61 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 19/38 | 23/45 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 51% |
Moriya blasted 4 aces . Nava blasted 7 aces . Moriya won 67% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Nava won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moriya | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/19 | 3/11 |
| % Converted | 26% | 27% |
| Conceded | 8 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 38% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 5 times with a 26% conversion rate. Hiroki conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded. Emilio broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moriya | |||
| Q1 Menendez-Maceiras |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-62 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 111-100 | 111-100 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 51/89 | 51/89 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 34/51 | 34/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/38 | 19/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/19 | 5/19 | |
| Converted % | 26% | 26% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Nava | |||
| Q1 Blanch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 121-109 | 121-109 | |
| Total points | 230 | 230 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 61/106 | 61/106 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 50/61 | 50/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 23/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLLWWL
LLWLLWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
