Liam Broady and Jason Jung will square off in the qualifications of the Delray Beach Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Liam Broady who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Liam Broady is the pick to win this match.
Liam Broady -> 1.41
Jason Jung -> 2.91
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Liam Broady vs. Jason Jung
This will be the 2nd time that Liam Broady and Jason Jung fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Broady (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Broady won 6-4 6-2 in the qualifications in at the French Open back in 2021.
Liam Broady
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-15 | 7-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-28 | 23-9 | 2-4 | 15-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 16-9 | 2-5 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-26 | 19-10 | 7-5 | 16-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 2-4 | 9-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 121 (career-high), Broady reached the qualifications after beating Cedrik-Marcel Stebe 6-1 7-64.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Stebe (6-1 7-64). During the match, Broady scored 69 points vs Stebe’s 51. Liam was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Broady scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Liam Broady was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (29/36) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Stebe twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Broady has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (360-247). 4-1 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Broady has an overall 208-118 record in the last years on hard.
Broady has a composed 8-3 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Delray Beach
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, Jung reached the qualifications after beating Renzo Olivo 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Jason had a good straight sets win against Olivo (6-2 6-3). During the match Jung scored 60 points vs Olivo’s 43. Jason was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Jung scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Jason Jung lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Jung put 60% of his first serves in, winning 72% (23/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Olivo 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The Chinese has an aggregate 3-5 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Broady | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 |
| Pts | 69-51 | 60-43 |
| Total Points | 120 | 103 |
| Winners | 29 | 23 |
| %Winners | 42% | 38% |
Both Broady and Jung played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Broady and Jung have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Broady played 3 games more than Jung. Broady scored 29 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Jung scored 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Broady | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 36/58 | 32/53 |
| %1st in | 62% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 23/32 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 9/21 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 43% |
Broady recorded 1 ace . Jung also managed to score 1 ace . Broady won 81% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Broady | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 40% | 63% |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Broady broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Broady extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. Jason broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Broady | |||
| Q1 Stebe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-51 | 69-51 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/58 | 36/58 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 29/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Olivo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 60-43 | 60-43 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/53 | 32/53 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLLLL
LWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Andreas SeppiSeppi (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Kevin AndersonAnderson (4-5) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Marcos GironGiron (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jack SockSock – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jason JungJung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – John MillmanMillman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Denis KudlaKudla (0-1) – H2H and prediction
