Kimmer Coppejans and Borna Gojo will play each other in the quarter of the Bengalaru 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kimmer Coppejans who should win in 3 sets.
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.87
Borna Gojo -> 1.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Borna Gojo
This will be the 2nd time that Kimmer Coppejans and Borna Gojo square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Coppejans (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Coppejans won 3-6 6-1 7-6(7) in the qualifications in Pune back in January 2022.
Kimmer Coppejans
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-6 | 22-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2020 | 14-17 | 6-5 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 216, Coppejans got to the quarter after beating Marc Polmans 1-6 6-2 6-4 and Altug Celikbilek 7-612 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Coppejans had a good straight sets win against Celikbilek (7-612 6-3).During the match, Coppejans scored less points (1) than Celikbilek. In fact, the world no. 216 won 77 points vs Celikbilek’s. That means that Coppejans was more focused during the important points. Kimmer was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Coppejans made 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 58% of his first serves in, winning 57% (27/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (22/34) on the 2nd serve. Kimmer broke Celikbilek 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Belgian has lost 1 set in this event to conquer 50% of the points he played.
Coppejans has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (344-244). 4-3 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Coppejans has an overall 98-65 match record in the last years on hard.
Coppejans has a composed 4-3 win-loss record in 2022, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bengalaru 1 Challenger
Borna Gojo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-25 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 6-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-28 | 19-9 | 5-5 | 14-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 21-22 | 8-7 | 3-6 | 7-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 23-14 | 11-6 | 10-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 288, Gojo reached the quarter after defeating Jaroslav Pospisil 7-62 3-6 6-4, Sasi Kumar Mukund 6-3 6-2, Rio Noguchi 3-6 6-1 6-2 and Aleksandar Vukic 7-5 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Gojo had a good straight sets win against Vukic (7-5 6-3). During the match Gojo scored 71 points vs Vukic’s 59. Borna was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Gojo struck 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Borna Gojo was exceptionally effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Borna broke Vukic 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Borna has an overall 8-3 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Coppejans | Gojo |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 4 |
Tot Set | 5 | 10 |
Tot Games | 47 | 94 |
Pts | 149-151 | 330-265 |
Total Points | 300 | 595 |
Winners | 62 | 143 |
%Winners | 42% | 43% |
Coppejans played 2 matches while Gojo competed in 4 matches. Gojo started his run from the qualifications while Coppejans had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Kimmer Coppejans surrendered 1 set, while Borna Gojo conceded 2 sets. Coppejans has played 5 set(s) less than Gojo (5 vs 10). Therefore, Coppejans played 47 games less than Gojo. Kimmer scored 62 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Borna scored 143 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Coppejans | Gojo |
---|---|---|
Aces | 13 | 49 |
Avg per match | 6.5 | 12.3 |
1st in | 94/158 | 186/287 |
%1st in | 59% | 65% |
1st pts | 62/94 | 143/186 |
%1st pts | 66% | 77% |
2nd pts | 30/64 | 54/101 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 53% |
Coppejans struck 13 aces (6.5 per match). Gojo managed to score 49 aces (12.3 per match). Coppejans won 66% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Gojo won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Coppejans | Gojo |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 15 |
Converted | 8/15 | 15/33 |
% Converted | 53% | 45% |
Conceded | 10 | 21 |
Saved | 3 | 14 |
% Saved | 30% | 67% |
Times Broken | 7 | 7 |
Kimmer broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Belgian dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 30% of the break points that he conceded. Gojo broke his opponents 15 times with a 45% conversion rate. Gojo conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Coppejans | ||||
R1 Polmans | R2 Celikbilek | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | 7-612 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 22 | 47 | |
pts | 72-73 | 77-78 | 149-151 | |
Total points | 145 | 155 | 300 | |
Winners | 35 | 27 | 62 | |
%Winners | 49% | 35% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
1st in | 47/77 | 47/81 | 94/158 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 58% | 59% | |
1st pts | 35/47 | 27/47 | 62/94 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 57% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 8/30 | 22/34 | 30/64 | |
% 2nd pts | 27% | 65% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 3/8 | 8/15 | |
Converted % | 71% | 38% | 53% | |
Conceded | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
Saved | 1/6 | 2/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 17% | 50% | 34% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 2 | 7 |
Gojo | ||||||
Q1 Pospisil | Q3 Kumar Mukund | R1 Noguchi | R2 Vukic | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 3-6 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 17 | 24 | 21 | 94 | |
pts | 101-95 | 66-45 | 92-66 | 71-59 | 330-265 | |
Total points | 196 | 111 | 158 | 130 | 595 | |
Winners | 44 | 28 | 38 | 33 | 143 | |
%Winners | 44% | 42% | 41% | 46% | 43% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 17 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 49 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
1st in | 56/88 | 34/51 | 50/74 | 46/74 | 186/287 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 67% | 68% | 62% | 65% | |
1st pts | 44/56 | 28/34 | 38/50 | 33/46 | 143/186 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 82% | 76% | 72% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 16/32 | 10/17 | 13/24 | 15/28 | 54/101 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 59% | 54% | 54% | 53% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 15 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 3/7 | 5/11 | 3/5 | 15/33 | |
Converted % | 40% | 43% | 45% | 60% | 45% | |
Conceded | 7 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 21 | |
Saved | 3/7 | 3/3 | 5/7 | 3/4 | 14 | |
Saved % | 43% | 100% | 71% | 75% | 145% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Alexandre MullerMuller (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Borna GojoGojo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (0-0) – H2H and prediction