Jurij Rodionov and Nick Hardt will square off in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jurij Rodionov who should win in 3 sets.
Jurij Rodionov -> 1.53
Nick Hardt -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jurij Rodionov vs. Nick Hardt
There is no head to head record between Jurij Rodionov and Nick Hardt since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jurij Rodionov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-30 | 17-12 | 14-10 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 10-10 | 6-12 | 11-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-33 | 3-6 | 15-13 | 21-11 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-31 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 21-11 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-28 | 2-4 | 2-7 | 13-13 | 3-3 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 137, Rodionov reached the 2nd round after beating Brayden Schnur 6-4 5-7 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Austrian defeated Schnur (6-4 5-7 7-5). During the match, Rodionov scored 110 points vs Schnur’s 101. Rodionov was very aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Rodionov blasted 13 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Jurij Rodionov lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Rodionov put 67% of his first serves in, winning 70% (51/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (22/36) on the 2nd serve. Jurij broke Schnur 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Rodionov has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (159-119). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Rodionov has an overall48-32 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The Austrian has an overall 2-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Nick Hardt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-21 | 1-3 | 30-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-25 | 6-6 | 34-18 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-28 | 11-9 | 10-16 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-25 | 18-6 | 28-16 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-19 | 9-6 | 35-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 353, Nick got to the 2nd round after defeating Chad Miller 6-1 6-0, Emilio Nava 6-2 4-6 6-0 and Ryan Harrison 6-4 7-63.
In the 1st round, Hardt had a good straight sets win against Harrison (6-4 7-63). During the match Hardt scored 80 points vs Harrison’s 73. Nick was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Hardt struck 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Nick Hardt lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Hardt put 69% of his first serves in, winning 65% (37/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the 2nd serve. The Dominican broke Harrison twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Nick has a compiled 3-0 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rodionov | Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 60 |
| Pts | 110-101 | 240-175 |
| Total Points | 211 | 415 |
| Winners | 51 | 93 |
| %Winners | 46% | 39% |
Rodionov played 1 match while Hardt competed in 3 matches. Hardt started his run from the qualifications while Rodionov had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Jurij Rodionov dropped 1 set, while Nick Hardt surrendered 1 set. Rodionov has played 4 set(s) less than Hardt (3 vs 7). Therefore, Rodionov played 26 games less than Hardt. Rodionov scored 51 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Hardt blasted 93 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rodionov | Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 73/109 | 129/194 |
| %1st in | 67% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 51/73 | 93/129 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 41/65 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 63% |
Rodionov struck 13 aces . Hardt bagged 5 aces (1.7 per match). Rodionov won 70% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Hardt won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rodionov | Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 13 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 13/29 |
| % Converted | 75% | 45% |
| Conceded | 9 | 14 |
| Saved | 7 | 11 |
| % Saved | 78% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Rodionov broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Rodionov surrendered his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Nick broke his opponents 13 times with a 45% conversion rate. Nick conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rodionov | |||
| R1 Schnur | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 110-101 | 110-101 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 73/109 | 73/109 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 51/73 | 51/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 22/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hardt | |||||
| Q1 Miller | Q3 Nava | R1 Harrison | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 24 | 23 | 60 | |
| pts | 63-30 | 97-72 | 80-73 | 240-175 | |
| Total points | 93 | 169 | 153 | 415 | |
| Winners | 18 | 38 | 37 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 39% | 46% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 20/34 | 52/77 | 57/83 | 129/194 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 68% | 69% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 18/20 | 38/52 | 37/57 | 93/129 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 73% | 65% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 13/25 | 17/26 | 41/65 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 52% | 65% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 2 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 6/14 | 2/5 | 13/29 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 43% | 40% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 8 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/6 | 7/8 | 11 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 88% | 155% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Jack SockSock – Go SoedaSoeda (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Emilio GomezGomez – Nicola KuhnKuhn (7-66 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Jeff WolfWolf (6-2 2-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Stefan KozlovKozlov (4-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jack SockSock – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction