Jack Sock and Go Soeda will square off in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Sock who should win in 2 sets.
Jack Sock -> 1.22
Go Soeda -> 4.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Sock vs. Go Soeda
This will be the 3rd time that Jack Sock and Go Soeda clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Sock and Soeda (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Sock won 6-3 6-4 in the 1st round in Miami back in 2015.
Jack Sock
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-21 | 5-8 | 8-4 | 7-5 | 13-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-16 | 12-8 | 0-1 | 8-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-6 | 8-4 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 1-8 | 0-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 157, Sock reached the 2nd round after defeating Christopher Eubanks 7-67 6-74 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Eubanks (7-67 6-74 6-4). During the match, Sock scored 115 points vs Eubanks’s 100. The American was very aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sock submerged his opponent with 22 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jack Sock was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (52/64) of his 1st serve and 82% (28/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Eubanks once after converting 14% of his break points (1/7).
Sock has a favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (222-168). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sock has an overall 51-32 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Jack has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Sock has never competed in this tournament before.
Go Soeda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5-13 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-20 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 6-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-9 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 45-27 | 25-19 | 4-2 | 6-2 | 9-3 | 1-1 |
| 2018 | 27-26 | 16-18 | 0-2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 5-2 |
Ranked no. 266, Go reached the 2nd round after beating Tung-Lin Wu 7-65 6-2.
In the 1st round, Soeda had a good straight sets win against Wu (7-65 6-2). During the match Soeda scored 69 points vs Wu’s 59. The Japanese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Soeda fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Go Soeda was very effective on serve to win 76% (28/37) of his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Go broke Wu 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Soeda has a compiled 2-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sock | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 21 |
| Pts | 115-100 | 69-59 |
| Total Points | 215 | 128 |
| Winners | 52 | 28 |
| %Winners | 45% | 41% |
Both Sock and Soeda played 1 match. At the moment, Jack Sock conceded 1 set while Go Soeda hasn’t dropped a set so far. Sock has played 1 set more than Soeda (3 vs 2). Therefore, Sock played 15 games more than Soeda. The American scored 52 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Go fired 28 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sock | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 22 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 22 | 3 |
| 1st in | 64/98 | 37/65 |
| %1st in | 65% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 52/64 | 28/37 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 28/34 | 16/28 |
| %2nd pts | 82% | 57% |
Sock fired 22 aces . Soeda fired 3 aces . Sock won 81% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 82% of the points. On the other side, Soeda won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sock | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 3 |
| Converted | 1/7 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 14% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Sock broke his opponent once with a 14% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 5 break points. The Japanese broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Soeda conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sock | |||
| R1 Eubanks | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-74 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
| pts | 115-100 | 115-100 | |
| Total points | 215 | 215 | |
| Winners | 52 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 22 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 64/98 | 64/98 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 52/64 | 52/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/34 | 28/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/7 | 1/7 | |
| Converted % | 14% | 14% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Soeda | |||
| R1 Wu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 69-59 | 69-59 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/65 | 37/65 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 28/37 | 28/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 16/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Denis IstominIstomin – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (7-5 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-67 6-4) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Michael MmohMmoh (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Jack AnthropAnthrop (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (2-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Jason JungJung (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-4 6-73 7-60) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Go SoedaSoeda – Tung-Lin WuWu (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Jack SockSock – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-67 6-74 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Alexander BernardBernard (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jack SockSock – Go SoedaSoeda (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Emilio GomezGomez (0-2) – H2H and prediction