Pedro Cachin and Gonzalo Lama will play each other in the 2nd round of the Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on CANCHA 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Pedro Cachin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Pedro Cachin is the pick to win this match.
Pedro Cachin -> 1.5
Gonzalo Lama -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Pedro Cachin vs. Gonzalo Lama
This will be the 5th time that Pedro Cachin and Gonzalo Lama play each other. The head to head is 4-0 for Lama (see full H2H stats), 4-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Lama won 7-6(5) 6-1 in the 2nd round in the Punta Del Este Challenger back in 2019.
Pedro Cachin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-19 | 0-5 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-32 | 4-8 | 28-19 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-22 | 5-4 | 41-13 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-0 | 47-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, Pedro reached the 2nd round after defeating Ignacio Monzon 7-62 6-2 and Andrej Martin 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Cachin had a good straight sets win against Martin (6-2 6-4). During the match, Cachin scored 60 points vs Martin’s 41. The Argentine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cachin blasted 9 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults. Pedro Cachin was pretty efficient on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Argentine broke Martin 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Cachin has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (346-212). 2-0 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cachin has an aggregate 332-190 record in the last years on clay.
The Argentine has a composed 4-2 win-loss record in 2022, 2-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger
Pedro has never competed in this tournament before.
Gonzalo Lama
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-29 | 3-4 | 15-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-29 | 0-0 | 39-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-19 | 0-1 | 49-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-16 | 1-4 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 301, the Chilean got to the 2nd round after beating Carlos Gomez-Herrera 7-64 7-63.
In the 1st round, Gonzalo had a good straight sets win against Gomez-Herrera (7-64 7-63).During the match Lama scored less points (2) than Gomez-Herrera. In fact, the world no. 246 won 84 points vs Gomez-Herrera’s. That means that Lama was more focused during the important points. Gonzalo was pretty aggressive to blast 51 winners.
About the serving games, Lama recorded 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Gonzalo Lama conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 8 break points. Furthermore, Lama put 64% of his first serves in, winning 80% (51/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (17/36) on the 2nd serve.
The Chilean’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Buenos Aires Challenger and the Concepcion Challenger.
Lama has an overall 7-3 win-loss record in 2022, 7-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cachin | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 26 |
| Pts | 145-102 | 84-86 |
| Total Points | 247 | 170 |
| Winners | 60 | 51 |
| %Winners | 41% | 61% |
Cachin played 2 matches while Lama competed in 1 match. Cachin started his run from the qualifications while Lama had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Cachin has played 2 sets more than Lama (4 vs 2). Therefore, Cachin played 13 games more than Lama. Pedro scored 60 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Lama recorded 51 winners (61%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cachin | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 8.5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 73/112 | 64/100 |
| %1st in | 65% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 60/73 | 51/64 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 24/39 | 17/36 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 47% |
Cachin struck 17 aces (8.5 per match). Lama fired 7 aces . Cachin won 82% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Lama won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cachin | Lama |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 0 |
| Converted | 6/17 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | 35% | 0% |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Cachin broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. On the other side, Lama hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The Chilean was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 8 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Cachin | ||||
| Q3 Monzon |
R1 Martin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
| pts | 85-61 | 60-41 | 145-102 | |
| Total points | 146 | 101 | 247 | |
| Winners | 33 | 27 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 45% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 9 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/62 | 35/50 | 73/112 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 70% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 33/38 | 27/35 | 60/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 77% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 10/15 | 24/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 67% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/7 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 43% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 0/0 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Lama | ||||
| R1 Gomez-Herrera |
Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-63 | |||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | ||
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | ||
| pts | 84-86 | 84-86 | ||
| Total points | 170 | 170 | ||
| Winners | 51 | 51 | ||
| %Winners | 61% | 61% | ||
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | ||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 64/100 | 64/100 | ||
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | ||
| 1st pts | 51/64 | 51/64 | ||
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | ||
| 2nd pts | 17/36 | 17/36 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | ||
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 0 | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | ||
| Saved | 8/8 | 8 | ||
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLL
L Tennis Scores in Santa Cruz De La Sierra Challenger
- Cristian RodriguezRodriguez – Boris AriasArias (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (7-64 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Michel VernierVernier (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Carlos Gomez-HerreraGomez-Herrera (7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-5 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Diego HidalgoHidalgo (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Orlando LuzLuz (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Andrej MartinMartin (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (6-73 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (4-6 7-5 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Darian KingKing (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Federico ZeballosZeballos (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (6-7(3) 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Orlando LuzLuz (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Cristian RodriguezRodriguez – Boris AriasArias (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Andrej MartinMartin (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Pedro CachinCachin (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Cristian RodriguezRodriguez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (1-2) – H2H and prediction
