Andrey Kuznetsov and Jonas Forejtek will square off in the qualifications of the Quimper Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 4:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrey Kuznetsov who should win in 3 sets.
Andrey Kuznetsov -> 1.63
Jonas Forejtek -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Andrey Kuznetsov vs. Jonas Forejtek
This will be the 2nd time that Andrey Kuznetsov and Jonas Forejtek clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kuznetsov (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Kuznetsov won 6-1 6-7(5) 7-5 in the qualifications in the St. Petersburg 1 Challenger back in 2021.
Andrey Kuznetsov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-16 | 2-6 | 6-7 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-21 | 14-5 | 8-8 | 14-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-6 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 261, the Russian got to the qualifications after beating David Pel 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Pel (6-4 6-4). During the match, Kuznetsov scored 64 points vs Pel’s 46. Andrey was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kuznetsov was unable to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Andrey Kuznetsov was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 96% (25/26) of his 1st serve and 79% (15/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Russian broke Pel twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Kuznetsov has a positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (196-147). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kuznetsov has a compiled 44-36 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Andrey has an overall 1-1 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Quimper Challenger
Kuznetsov has never competed in this tournament before.
Jonas Forejtek
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-17 | 0-0 | 30-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2024 | 36-27 | 5-4 | 23-20 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 0-3 | 17-10 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 32-24 | 3-2 | 14-11 | 14-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 35-31 | 2-2 | 13-18 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 307, Jonas got to the qualifications after beating Jurgen Briand 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Briand (6-1 6-0). During the match Forejtek scored 50 points vs Briand’s 19. Jonas was very aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Forejtek fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jonas Forejtek was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (17/21) of his 1st serve and 78% (7/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Forejtek broke Briand 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Forejtek has a composed 2-1 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kuznetsov | Forejtek |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 13 |
| Pts | 64-46 | 50-19 |
| Total Points | 110 | 69 |
| Winners | 25 | 17 |
| %Winners | 39% | 34% |
Both Kuznetsov and Forejtek played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kuznetsov and Forejtek have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kuznetsov played 7 games more than Forejtek. Andrey scored 25 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Forejtek blasted 17 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kuznetsov | Forejtek |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 21/30 |
| %1st in | 58% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 25/26 | 17/21 |
| %1st pts | 96% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 15/19 | 7/9 |
| %2nd pts | 79% | 78% |
Kuznetsov didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Forejtek fired 3 aces . Kuznetsov won 96% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Forejtek won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 78% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kuznetsov | Forejtek |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 6/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 60% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Andrey broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Kuznetsov had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Czech broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Jonas was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Kuznetsov | |||
| Q1 Pel | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 64-46 | 64-46 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 26/45 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 25/26 | 25/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/19 | 15/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Forejtek | |||
| Q1 Briand | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 50-19 | 50-19 | |
| Total points | 69 | 69 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 21/30 | 21/30 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 17/21 | 17/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Joao SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Zizou BergsBergs (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Lucas PouillePouille (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Jo-Wilfried TsongaTsonga (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Gilles SimonSimon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – (0-0) – H2H and prediction