Jay Clarke and Jack Draper will square off in the final of the Forli 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 6:00 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Draper is the pick to win this match.
Jack Draper -> 1.35
Jay Clarke -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jay Clarke vs. Jack Draper
There is no head to head record between Jay Clarke and Jack Draper since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jay Clarke
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 54-29 | 6-4 | 41-18 | 6-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-19 | 10-12 | 21-4 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 22-27 | 11-12 | 3-4 | 7-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-28 | 7-7 | 8-14 | 3-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-11 | 4-5 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 211, Clarke reached the final after defeating Nicolas Mejia 4-6 6-3 6-4, Antoine Escoffier 2-6 6-2 6-3, Paul Jubb 6-4 7-60 and Adrian Andreev 6-4 6-75 6-3.
In the semifinal, The Brit defeated Andreev (6-4 6-75 6-3). During the match, Clarke scored 99 points vs Andreev’s 89. Jay was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Clarke blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jay Clarke was quite efficient on serve to win 81% (43/53) of his 1st serve and 57% (25/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jay broke Andreev 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jay started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 3 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Clarke has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (189-139). 6-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Clarke has a compiled21-19 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Clarke’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Forli 2 Challenger.
Jay has a compiled 6-1 win-loss record in 2022, 6-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 2 Challenger
Jack Draper
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
2020 | 17-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 262, Draper reached the final after defeating Roberto Quiroz 6-1 6-4, Luca Nardi 6-0 6-1 and Alexander Ritschard 3-6 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter against Ritschard, Draper recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-3). During the match Draper scored 91 points vs Ritschard’s 90. Jack was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Draper struck 14 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Jack Draper lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Draper put 49% of his first serves in, winning 80% (39/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (25/50) on the 2nd serve. Jack broke Ritschard 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Jack has a composed 3-0 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Clarke | Draper |
---|---|---|
Match played | 4 | 4 |
Tot Set | 11 | 10 |
Tot Games | 109 | 74 |
Pts | 367-332 | 249-192 |
Total Points | 699 | 441 |
Winners | 153 | 99 |
%Winners | 42% | 40% |
Both Clarke and Draper played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jay Clarke surrendered 3 sets, while Jack Draper conceded 1 set. Clarke has played 1 set more than Draper (11 vs 10). Therefore, Clarke played 35 games more than Draper. Clarke scored 153 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Draper bagged 99 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Clarke | Draper |
---|---|---|
Aces | 23 | 32 |
Avg per match | 5.8 | 8 |
1st in | 206/361 | 119/227 |
%1st in | 57% | 52% |
1st pts | 153/206 | 99/119 |
%1st pts | 74% | 83% |
2nd pts | 83/155 | 58/108 |
%2nd pts | 54% | 54% |
Clarke recorded 23 aces (5.8 per match). Draper recorded 32 aces (8 per match). Clarke won 74% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Clarke | Draper |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 14 |
Converted | 12/34 | 14/27 |
% Converted | 35% | 52% |
Conceded | 22 | 14 |
Saved | 15 | 11 |
% Saved | 68% | 79% |
Times Broken | 7 | 3 |
Clarke broke his opponents 12 times with a 35% conversion rate. Clarke dropped his serve 7 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded. Jack broke his opponents 14 times with a 52% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
Clarke | ||||||
R1 Mejia |
R2 Escoffier |
1/4 Jubb |
1/2 Andreev |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | 6-4 7-60 | 6-4 6-75 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 25 | 23 | 32 | 109 | |
pts | 100-92 | 88-84 | 80-67 | 99-89 | 367-332 | |
Total points | 192 | 172 | 147 | 188 | 699 | |
Winners | 46 | 31 | 33 | 43 | 153 | |
%Winners | 46% | 35% | 41% | 43% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 23 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
1st in | 56/97 | 54/92 | 43/75 | 53/97 | 206/361 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 59% | 57% | 55% | 57% | |
1st pts | 46/56 | 31/54 | 33/43 | 43/53 | 153/206 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 57% | 77% | 81% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 19/41 | 26/38 | 13/32 | 25/44 | 83/155 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 68% | 41% | 57% | 54% | |
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
Converted | 2/11 | 3/11 | 4/6 | 3/6 | 12/34 | |
Converted % | 18% | 27% | 67% | 50% | 35% | |
Conceded | 5 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 22 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 7/9 | 3/6 | 1/2 | 15 | |
Saved % | 80% | 78% | 50% | 50% | 65% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
Draper | ||||||
R1 Quiroz |
R2 Nardi |
1/4 Ritschard |
Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-0 6-1 | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | |||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | ||
Tot Games | 17 | 13 | 30 | 60 | ||
pts | 62-46 | 53-24 | 91-90 | 206-160 | ||
Total points | 108 | 77 | 181 | 366 | ||
Winners | 18 | 24 | 39 | 81 | ||
%Winners | 29% | 45% | 43% | 39% | ||
SERVE | ||||||
Aces | 5 | 8 | 14 | 27 | ||
Double Faults | 8 | 2 | 9 | 19 | ||
1st in | 21/52 | 28/42 | 49/99 | 98/193 | ||
% 1st in | 40% | 67% | 49% | 51% | ||
1st pts | 18/21 | 24/28 | 39/49 | 81/98 | ||
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | 80% | 83% | ||
2nd pts | 16/31 | 7/14 | 25/50 | 48/95 | ||
% 2nd pts | 52% | 50% | 50% | 51% | ||
Breaks | ||||||
Won | 4 | 5 | 3 | 12 | ||
Converted | 4/9 | 5/7 | 3/5 | 12/21 | ||
Converted % | 44% | 71% | 60% | 57% | ||
Conceded | 3 | 2 | 9 | 14 | ||
Saved | 2/3 | 2/2 | 7/9 | 11 | ||
Saved % | 67% | 100% | 78% | 61% | ||
Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Forli 2 Challenger
- Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul – Nicolas Mejia/Alexander RitschardMejia/Alexander Ritschard (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jack DraperDraper – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction