Jay Clarke and Paul Jubb will face off in the quarter of the Forli 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 5:30 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.80
Jay Clarke -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jay Clarke vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Jay Clarke and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jay Clarke
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-24 | 6-3 | 36-16 | 3-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-19 | 10-12 | 21-4 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-27 | 11-12 | 3-4 | 7-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-28 | 7-7 | 8-14 | 3-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-11 | 4-5 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 211, Clarke reached the quarter after beating Nicolas Mejia 4-6 6-3 6-4 and Antoine Escoffier 2-6 6-2 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Escoffier, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-2 6-3). During the match, Clarke scored 88 points vs Escoffier’s 84. Jay was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Clarke recorded 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jay Clarke lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Clarke put 59% of his first serves in, winning 57% (31/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (26/38) on the 2nd serve. Clarke broke Escoffier 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jay started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 2 set in this competition to win 52% of the points he played.
Clarke has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (187-139). 4-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Clarke has an overall19-19 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Clarke has an overall 4-1 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 2 Challenger
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-24 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 347, the Brit got to the quarter after beating Giacomo Dambrosi 6-4 6-1, Jeremy Jahn 6-2 6-1, Tung-Lin Wu 6-2 6-73 6-1 and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe 4-6 7-5 6-1.
In the 2nd round against Stebe, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-1). During the match Jubb scored 101 points vs Stebe’s 84. Paul was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Jubb recorded 4 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Paul Jubb lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 65% of his first serves in, winning 58% (35/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the 2nd serve. Jubb broke Stebe 7 times after converting 41% of his break points (7/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
The Brit has an overall 4-0 win-loss record in 2022, 4-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Clarke | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 54 | 89 |
| Pts | 188-176 | 310-221 |
| Total Points | 364 | 531 |
| Winners | 77 | 112 |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% |
Clarke played 2 matches while Jubb competed in 4 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while Clarke had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Jay Clarke surrendered 2 sets, while Paul Jubb surrendered 2 sets. Clarke has played 4 set(s) less than Jubb (6 vs 10). Therefore, Clarke played 35 games less than Jubb. The Brit scored 77 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Paul fired 112 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Clarke | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3.8 |
| 1st in | 110/189 | 157/253 |
| %1st in | 58% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 77/110 | 112/157 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 45/79 | 66/96 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 69% |
Clarke struck 12 aces (6 per match). Jubb fired 15 aces (3.8 per match). Clarke won 70% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Clarke | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 20 |
| Converted | 5/22 | 20/45 |
| % Converted | 23% | 44% |
| Conceded | 14 | 13 |
| Saved | 11 | 7 |
| % Saved | 79% | 54% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
Jay broke his opponents 5 times with a 23% conversion rate. Jay conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Jubb broke his opponents 20 times with a 44% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 54% of the break points that he conceded.
| Clarke | ||||
| R1 Mejia |
R2 Escoffier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 25 | 54 | |
| pts | 100-92 | 88-84 | 188-176 | |
| Total points | 192 | 172 | 364 | |
| Winners | 46 | 31 | 77 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 35% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 3 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 56/97 | 54/92 | 110/189 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 59% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 46/56 | 31/54 | 77/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 57% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/41 | 26/38 | 45/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 68% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/11 | 3/11 | 5/22 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 27% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 | 14 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 7/9 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 78% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Jubb | ||||||
| Q1 Dambrosi |
Q3 Jahn |
R1 Wu |
R2 Stebe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | 6-2 6-73 6-1 | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 28 | 29 | 89 | |
| pts | 60-39 | 58-31 | 91-67 | 101-84 | 310-221 | |
| Total points | 99 | 89 | 158 | 185 | 531 | |
| Winners | 21 | 19 | 37 | 35 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 33% | 41% | 35% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 27/47 | 23/33 | 47/80 | 60/93 | 157/253 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 70% | 59% | 65% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 19/23 | 37/47 | 35/60 | 112/157 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 83% | 79% | 58% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/20 | 7/10 | 24/33 | 19/33 | 66/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 70% | 73% | 58% | 69% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 20 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 6/11 | 4/9 | 7/17 | 20/45 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 55% | 44% | 41% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 6/11 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 100% | 55% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWWW
LWLLWLWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Adrian AndreevAndreev (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
