Edward Winter and Jesper De Jong will face off in the qualifications of the Australian Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.21
Edward Winter -> 4.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Edward Winter vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Edward Winter and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Edward Winter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-20 | 19-17 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 10-10 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Gilles Simon 6-3 1-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Winter defeated Simon (6-3 1-6 6-3). During the match, Winter scored 89 points vs Simon’s 87. Edward was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Winter made 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Edward Winter lost the serve 4 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Winter put 59% of his first serves in, winning 60% (34/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (21/39) on the 2nd serve. Edward broke Simon 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Winter has a solid win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 62% of his matches (5-3). 1-1 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Winter has a composed5-3 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
The Australian has a compiled 1-1 win-loss record in 2022, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the Australian Open
Winter has never competed in this tournament before.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 7-3 | 20-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 207, De got to the qualifications after defeating Akira Santillan 5-7 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Santillan, De recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-3). During the match De scored 90 points vs Santillan’s 85. De was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, De struck 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Jesper De Jong was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (39/49) of his 1st serve and 51% (20/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The Dutch broke Santillan 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
De’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Traralgon Challenger.
De has an overall 4-1 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Winter | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 31 |
| Pts | 89-87 | 90-85 |
| Total Points | 176 | 175 |
| Winners | 34 | 39 |
| %Winners | 38% | 43% |
Both Winter and De played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Edward Winter lost 1 set, while Jesper De Jong conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Winter and De have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Winter played 6 games less than De. Winter scored 34 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Jesper recorded 39 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Winter | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
| 1st in | 57/96 | 49/88 |
| %1st in | 59% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 34/57 | 39/49 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 21/39 | 20/39 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 51% |
Winter fired 4 aces . De made 6 aces . Winter won 60% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, De won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Winter | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 57% | 50% |
| Conceded | 15 | 6 |
| Saved | 11 | 3 |
| % Saved | 73% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Winter broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Winter | |||
| Q1 Simon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 89-87 | 89-87 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 57/96 | 57/96 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 34/57 | 34/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/39 | 21/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 11/15 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| De | |||
| Q1 Santillan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 90-85 | 90-85 | |
| Total points | 175 | 175 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 49/88 | 49/88 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 39/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 20/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
LWWWWWWLWL Tennis Scores – Australian Open
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-1 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Max PurcellPurcell (7-62 7-68) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (7-63 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 2-1 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gastao EliasElias – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (7-67 4-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Robin HaaseHaase (7-5 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (7-68 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (7-5 5-7 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Dane SweenySweeny (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Elias YmerYmer – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (4-6 6-4 7-60) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Pedro CachinCachin (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-3 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-2 7-68) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Emilio GomezGomez – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao SousaSousa – Marc PolmansPolmans (3-6 6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Quentin HalysHalys (3-6 6-3 7-610) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-4 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip HoranskyFilip – Jurij RodionovJurij (7-6(5) 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Joao SousaSousa (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki BhambriBhambri – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Elias YmerYmer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Flavio CobolliCobolli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
