Jasmine Paolini and Lauren Davis will square off in the 2nd round of the Adelaide International 2 for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on MATCH COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jasmine Paolini who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jasmine Paolini is the pick to win this match.
Jasmine Paolini -> 1.52
Lauren Davis -> 2.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jasmine Paolini vs. Lauren Davis
There is no head to head record between Jasmine Paolini and Lauren Davis since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jasmine Paolini
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-19 | 19-10 | 12-5 | 1-2 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 20-16 | 16-8 | 5-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 14-11 | 10-10 | 6-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-24 | 17-13 | 12-7 | 5-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-15 | 1-8 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 52, the Italian reached the 2nd round after defeating Storm Sanders 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, Paolini had a good straight sets win against Sanders (7-5 6-2). During the match, Paolini scored 84 points vs Sanders’s 66. Jasmine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paolini scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and she committed only 5 double faults. Jasmine Paolini lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Paolini put 61% of her first serves in, winning 77% (33/43) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Paolini broke Sanders 4 times after converting 27% of her break points (4/15).
Paolini has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of her matches (279-195). 2-1 on hard in 2022. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Paolini has an aggregate80-63 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Italian has a composed 2-1 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Lauren Davis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-15 | 5-6 | 2-6 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-20 | 16-11 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 14-12 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-21 | 8-11 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-12 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 95, Lauren got to the 2nd round after beating Annerly Poulos 6-3 6-3, Eri Hozumi 6-3 1-6 6-1 and Jil Teichmann 1-6 7-63 6-4.
In the 1st round against Belen Teichmann, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-63 6-4).During the match Davis scored less points (4) than Belen Teichmann. In fact, the world no. 52 won 89 points vs Belen Teichmann’s. That means that Davis was more focused during the important points. Davis was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Davis scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Lauren Davis lost the serve 5 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Davis put 57% of her first serves in, winning 65% (33/51) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Belen Teichmann 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Lauren has a composed 3-1 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Lauren has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paolini | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 71 |
| Pts | 84-66 | 247-216 |
| Total Points | 150 | 463 |
| Winners | 33 | 83 |
| %Winners | 39% | 34% |
Paolini played 1 match while Davis competed in 3 matches. Davis started her run from the qualifications while Paolini had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Lauren Davis surrendered 2 sets while Jasmine Paolini hasn’t lost a set so far. Paolini has played 6 set(s) less than Davis (2 vs 8). Therefore, Paolini played 51 games less than Davis. Paolini scored 33 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Lauren recorded 83 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paolini | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 43/71 | 113/209 |
| %1st in | 61% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 33/43 | 83/113 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 48/96 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 50% |
Paolini struck 1 ace . Davis also blasted 9 aces (3 per match). Paolini won 77% points behind her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Davis won 73% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paolini | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/15 | 13/29 |
| % Converted | 27% | 45% |
| Conceded | 4 | 21 |
| Saved | 3 | 11 |
| % Saved | 75% | 52% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 10 |
The Italian broke her opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. Paolini dropped her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded. Davis broke her opponents 13 times with a 45% conversion rate. Davis conceded her serve 10 times and she saved 52% of the break points that she conceded.
| Paolini | |||
| R1 Sanders |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 84-66 | 84-66 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 43/71 | 43/71 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 33/43 | 33/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 13/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Davis | |||||
| Q1 Poulos |
Q3 Hozumi |
R1 Belen Teichmann |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | 1-6 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 30 | 71 | |
| pts | 76-57 | 82-66 | 89-93 | 247-216 | |
| Total points | 133 | 148 | 182 | 463 | |
| Winners | 26 | 24 | 33 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 29% | 37% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 1 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 30/52 | 32/68 | 51/89 | 113/209 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 47% | 57% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 24/32 | 33/51 | 83/113 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 75% | 65% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/22 | 20/36 | 19/38 | 48/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 56% | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 4/6 | 4/8 | 13/29 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 67% | 50% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 | 11 | 21 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 3/6 | 6/11 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 55% | 155% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWLWW
LWLWWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Adelaide
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Yshai OlielOliel (3-6 6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – Corentin MoutetMoutet (7-66 0-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Sam RifficeRiffice (3-6 6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Madison BrengleBrengle (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alison RiskeRiske – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – Maddison InglisInglis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova – Ana KonjuhKonjuh (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Cori GauffGauff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Madison KeysKeys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
