Alexey Vatutin and Denis Yevseyev will square off in the qualifications of the Forli 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CITTA’ DI FORLI’. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexey Vatutin who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alexey Vatutin is the pick to win this match.
Alexey Vatutin -> 1.76
Denis Yevseyev -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexey Vatutin vs. Denis Yevseyev
This will be the 3rd time that Alexey Vatutin and Denis Yevseyev face off. The head to head is 1-1 for Vatutin and Yevseyev (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Yevseyev won 6-3 1-6 7-5 in the qualifications in the Anif Challenger back in 2021.
Alexey Vatutin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-31 | 2-1 | 28-17 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 52-32 | 0-2 | 32-16 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-27 | 5-7 | 6-8 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 38-39 | 8-3 | 19-20 | 11-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-38 | 0-1 | 15-26 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 339, Vatutin got to the qualifications after beating Alexander Weis 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Weis (6-4 6-2). During the match, Vatutin scored 72 points vs Weis’s 48. The Russian was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vatutin scored 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Alexey Vatutin was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 86% (24/28) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Vatutin broke Weis 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Vatutin has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (366-255). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Vatutin has a composed 108-75 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Alexey has an aggregate 2-1 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 2 Challenger
Denis Yevseyev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-42 | 19-15 | 9-16 | 7-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-37 | 14-14 | 12-13 | 7-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 23-16 | 16-14 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 39-31 | 11-9 | 12-12 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 36-30 | 4-5 | 22-15 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 403, Yevseyev reached the qualifications after defeating Michael Vrbensky 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Denis had a good straight sets win against Vrbensky (6-3 6-2). During the match Yevseyev scored 66 points vs Vrbensky’s 53. Yevseyev was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Yevseyev bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Denis Yevseyev conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Yevseyev put 56% of his first serves in, winning 73% (30/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (16/32) on the 2nd serve. The Kazakhstani broke Vrbensky 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
The Kazakhstani has a compiled 4-1 win-loss record in 2022, 4-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vatutin | Yevseyev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 72-48 | 66-53 |
| Total Points | 120 | 119 |
| Winners | 24 | 30 |
| %Winners | 33% | 45% |
Both Vatutin and Yevseyev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vatutin and Yevseyev have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vatutin played 1 game more than Yevseyev. The Russian scored 24 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Denis fired 30 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vatutin | Yevseyev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 28/52 | 41/73 |
| %1st in | 54% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 30/41 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 16/32 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 50% |
Vatutin struck 2 aces . Yevseyev bagged 3 aces . Vatutin won 86% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Yevseyev won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vatutin | Yevseyev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 56% | 75% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 60% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Russian broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Alexey conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Kazakhstani broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Kazakhstani was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Vatutin | |||
| Q1 Weis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 72-48 | 72-48 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/52 | 28/52 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 24/28 | 24/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Yevseyev | |||
| Q1 Vrbensky |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-53 | 66-53 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/73 | 41/73 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/32 | 16/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWLW
LWWWLWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aldin SetkicSetkic – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeremy JahnJahn – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Denis IstominIstomin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
