Matteo Martineau and Gijs Brouwer will face off in the qualifications of the Forli 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on GENCOM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gijs Brouwer who should win in 3 sets.
Gijs Brouwer -> 1.88
Matteo Martineau -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Matteo Martineau vs. Gijs Brouwer
This will be the 3rd time that Matteo Martineau and Gijs Brouwer square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Martineau (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Martineau won 7-6(6) 6-1 in the semifinal in M15+H Bressuire back in 2021.
Matteo Martineau
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-35 | 2-9 | 7-12 | 18-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-33 | 2-4 | 7-13 | 18-13 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 0-1 | 23-17 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 2-1 | 23-20 | 11-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-26 | 4-4 | 27-15 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 334, the French player got to the qualifications after beating Yan Bondarevskiy 7-64 6-3.
In the qualifications, Martineau had a good straight sets win against Bondarevskiy (7-64 6-3). During the match, Martineau scored 80 points vs Bondarevskiy’s 69. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martineau bagged 4 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Matteo Martineau lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Martineau put 58% of his first serves in, winning 80% (39/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (13/35) on the 2nd serve. Martineau broke Bondarevskiy 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Martineau has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (165-125). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Martineau has a compiled39-35 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Matteo has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 2 Challenger
Martineau has never competed in this tournament before.
Gijs Brouwer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-27 | 14-12 | 6-5 | 4-5 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-34 | 5-8 | 3-6 | 12-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-27 | 12-5 | 13-5 | 14-12 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 9-5 | 12-10 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
Ranked no. 367, the Dutch got to the qualifications after defeating Alexandar Lazarov 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Gijs had a good straight sets win against Lazarov (6-3 6-3). During the match Brouwer scored 66 points vs Lazarov’s 53. Gijs was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Brouwer managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Gijs Brouwer conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Brouwer put 67% of his first serves in, winning 76% (31/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Gijs broke Lazarov 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Gijs has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martineau | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 80-69 | 66-53 |
| Total Points | 149 | 119 |
| Winners | 39 | 31 |
| %Winners | 49% | 47% |
Both Martineau and Brouwer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Martineau and Brouwer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Martineau played 4 games more than Brouwer. Matteo scored 39 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Gijs blasted 31 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martineau | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 49/84 | 41/61 |
| %1st in | 58% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 31/41 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/35 | 10/20 |
| %2nd pts | 37% | 50% |
Martineau made 4 aces . Brouwer made 3 aces . Martineau won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 37% of the points. On the other side, Brouwer won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martineau | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 75% | 33% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 8 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Martineau broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Martineau lost his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Brouwer broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Brouwer was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Martineau | |||
| Q1 Bondarevskiy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 80-69 | 80-69 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 49/84 | 49/84 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 39/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/35 | 13/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Brouwer | |||
| Q1 Lazarov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 66-53 | 66-53 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/61 | 41/61 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/41 | 31/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aldin SetkicSetkic – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeremy JahnJahn – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Denis IstominIstomin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction