Matteo Martineau and Gijs Brouwer will face off in the qualifications of the Forli 2 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on GENCOM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gijs Brouwer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gijs Brouwer is the pick to win this match.
Gijs Brouwer -> 1.88
Matteo Martineau -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matteo Martineau vs. Gijs Brouwer
This will be the 3rd time that Matteo Martineau and Gijs Brouwer square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Martineau (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Martineau won 7-6(6) 6-1 in the semifinal in M15+H Bressuire back in 2021.
Matteo Martineau
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-20 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 12-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 0-1 | 23-17 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 2-1 | 23-20 | 11-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-26 | 4-4 | 27-15 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 4-3 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 6-3 |
Ranked no. 334, the French player got to the qualifications after beating Yan Bondarevskiy 7-64 6-3.
In the qualifications, Martineau had a good straight sets win against Bondarevskiy (7-64 6-3). During the match, Martineau scored 80 points vs Bondarevskiy’s 69. The French player was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Martineau bagged 4 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Matteo Martineau lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Martineau put 58% of his first serves in, winning 80% (39/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (13/35) on the 2nd serve. Martineau broke Bondarevskiy 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Martineau has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (165-125). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Martineau has a compiled39-35 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Matteo has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 2 Challenger
Martineau has never competed in this tournament before.
Gijs Brouwer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-19 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 4-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-34 | 5-8 | 3-6 | 12-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-27 | 12-5 | 13-5 | 14-12 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 9-5 | 12-10 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2020 | 20-10 | 13-4 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 367, the Dutch got to the qualifications after defeating Alexandar Lazarov 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Gijs had a good straight sets win against Lazarov (6-3 6-3). During the match Brouwer scored 66 points vs Lazarov’s 53. Gijs was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Brouwer managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Gijs Brouwer conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Brouwer put 67% of his first serves in, winning 76% (31/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Gijs broke Lazarov 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Gijs has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martineau | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 80-69 | 66-53 |
| Total Points | 149 | 119 |
| Winners | 39 | 31 |
| %Winners | 49% | 47% |
Both Martineau and Brouwer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Martineau and Brouwer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Martineau played 4 games more than Brouwer. Matteo scored 39 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Gijs blasted 31 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martineau | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 49/84 | 41/61 |
| %1st in | 58% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 31/41 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/35 | 10/20 |
| %2nd pts | 37% | 50% |
Martineau made 4 aces . Brouwer made 3 aces . Martineau won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 37% of the points. On the other side, Brouwer won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martineau | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 75% | 33% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 8 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Martineau broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Martineau lost his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Brouwer broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Brouwer was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Martineau | |||
| Q1 Bondarevskiy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 80-69 | 80-69 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 49/84 | 49/84 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 39/49 | 39/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/35 | 13/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Brouwer | |||
| Q1 Lazarov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 66-53 | 66-53 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/61 | 41/61 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 31/41 | 31/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLLLW
WWLLWLWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aldin SetkicSetkic – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeremy JahnJahn – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev – Antoine HoangHoang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Denis IstominIstomin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
