Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Julian Lenz will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Forli 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CITTÀ DI FORLÌ. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cedrik-Marcel Stebe who should win in 3 sets.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 1.78
Julian Lenz -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs. Julian Lenz
This will be the 2nd time that Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Julian Lenz clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Stebe (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Stebe won 6-3 7-6(6) in the 1st round in the Marburg Challenger back in 2017.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-15 | 0-1 | 18-9 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2024 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 15-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-20 | 4-7 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 227, Stebe reached the 2nd round after beating Alexandar Lazarov 7-63 6-3.
In the 1st round, Cedrik-Marcel had a good straight sets win against Lazarov (7-63 6-3). During the match, Stebe scored 76 points vs Lazarov’s 60. Stebe was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stebe managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was very effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Stebe broke Lazarov 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Stebe has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (168-108). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Stebe has an aggregate 34-20 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Cedrik-Marcel has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Forli 1 Challenger
Cedrik-Marcel has never competed in this tournament before.
Julian Lenz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19-19 | 2-2 | 7-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 19-30 | 2-2 | 9-15 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 8-13 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
| 2019 | 48-27 | 4-1 | 22-14 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 9-3 |
| 2018 | 25-20 | 2-1 | 16-11 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 |
Ranked no. 300, Julian got to the 2nd round after beating Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Julian had a good straight sets win against Hsiou Hsu (6-4 6-4). During the match Lenz scored 61 points vs Hsiou Hsu’s 51. Julian was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Lenz managed to score 7 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Julian Lenz lost the serve once. Furthermore, Lenz put 79% of his first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (5/10) on the 2nd serve. Julian broke Hsiou Hsu 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Lenz has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stebe | Lenz |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 20 |
| Pts | 76-60 | 61-51 |
| Total Points | 136 | 112 |
| Winners | 33 | 31 |
| %Winners | 43% | 51% |
Both Stebe and Lenz played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Stebe and Lenz have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Stebe played 2 games more than Lenz. The German scored 33 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Lenz blasted 31 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stebe | Lenz |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 46/65 | 38/48 |
| %1st in | 71% | 79% |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 31/38 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 5/10 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 50% |
Stebe bagged 3 aces . Lenz blasted 7 aces . Stebe won 72% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Lenz won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stebe | Lenz |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 30% |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 57% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Stebe broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The German dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Julian conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stebe | |||
| R1 Lazarov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 76-60 | 76-60 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 46/65 | 46/65 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 33/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Lenz | |||
| R1 Hsiou | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 61-51 | 61-51 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 38/48 | 38/48 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Forli 1 Challenger
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Alexander RitschardRitschard (5-7 6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Lorenzo AngeliniAngelini (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Nerman FaticFatic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Jeremy JahnJahn (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Christian HarrisonHarrison – Aldin SetkicSetkic (2-6 7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Louis WesselsWessels (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca NardiNardi – Lucas CatarinaCatarina (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Matteo ViolaViola (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-63 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Julian LenzLenz – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Nick ChappellChappell (6-75 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Julian LenzLenz – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Christian HarrisonHarrison (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luca PotenzaPotenza – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction