Bernarda Pera and Qinwen Zheng will play each other in the qualifications of the Melbourne Summer Set 1 for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 11:00 am on Court 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernarda Pera who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernarda Pera is the pick to win this match.
Bernarda Pera -> 1.72
Qinwen Zheng -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernarda Pera vs. Qinwen Zheng
There is no head to head record between Bernarda Pera and Qinwen Zheng since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Bernarda Pera
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 37-24 | 21-16 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 20-23 | 9-12 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-20 | 10-9 | 19-6 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-24 | 5-11 | 8-8 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-13 | 9-8 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 93, the American got to the qualifications after beating Rebecca Sramkova 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Sramkova (6-0 6-2). During the match, Pera scored 57 points vs Sramkova’s 27. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pera couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the encounter and she committed only 2 double faults. Bernarda Pera was quite efficient on serve to win 95% (18/19) of her 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Pera broke Sramkova 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Pera has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 58% of her matches (169-124). 1-0 on hard in 2022. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Pera has a composed55-60 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Pera has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Melbourne
Pera has never competed in this tournament before.
Qinwen Zheng
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 49-16 | 31-10 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-19 | 23-11 | 11-4 | 3-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-19 | 27-12 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-11 | 7-1 | 16-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 38-8 | 3-3 | 26-3 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 126, the Chinese reached the qualifications after beating Jule Niemeier 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Niemeier (6-4 6-0). During the match Zheng scored 65 points vs Niemeier’s 46. Zheng was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Zheng blasted 5 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Qinwen Zheng lost the serve twice and she saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Zheng put 57% of her first serves in, winning 74% (28/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 38% (11/29) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Niemeier 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Qinwen has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Melbourne
Zheng has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Pera | Zheng |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 14 | 16 |
Pts | 57-27 | 65-46 |
Total Points | 84 | 111 |
Winners | 18 | 28 |
%Winners | 32% | 43% |
Both Pera and Zheng played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pera and Zheng have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Pera played 2 games less than Zheng. Pera scored 18 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese managed to score 28 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Pera | Zheng |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 5 |
Avg per match | 0 | 5 |
1st in | 19/35 | 38/67 |
%1st in | 54% | 57% |
1st pts | 18/19 | 28/38 |
%1st pts | 95% | 74% |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/29 |
%2nd pts | 69% | 38% |
Pera didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Zheng blasted 5 aces . Pera won 95% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Zheng won 74% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Pera | Zheng |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 6 |
Converted | 5/8 | 6/9 |
% Converted | 63% | 67% |
Conceded | 0 | 13 |
Saved | 0 | 11 |
% Saved | 0% | 85% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The American broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Pera very solid her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Chinese broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Qinwen conceded her serve twice and she saved 85% of the break points that she conceded.
Pera | |||
Q1 Sramkova |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 57-27 | 57-27 | |
Total points | 84 | 84 | |
Winners | 18 | 18 | |
%Winners | 32% | 32% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 19/35 | 19/35 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
1st pts | 18/19 | 18/19 | |
% 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Zheng | |||
Q1 Niemeier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 65-46 | 65-46 | |
Total points | 111 | 111 | |
Winners | 28 | 28 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 38/67 | 38/67 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 11/29 | 11/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
Saved | 11/13 | 11 | |
Saved % | 85% | 85% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Melbourne
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Petr MichnevMichnev (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Marco ChiudinelliChiudinelli (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Tim PuetzPuetz (6-3 6-76 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Franko SkugorSkugor – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (7-5 5-7 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Olga GovortsovaGovortsova – Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Mai HontamaHontama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Qinwen ZhengZheng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Nao HibinoHibino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naomi OsakaOsaka – Alize CornetCornet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Maryna ZanevskaZanevska (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Clara BurelBurel (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PetkovicPetkovic – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PotapovaPotapova – Lizette CabreraCabrera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Ana KonjuhKonjuh (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jaqueline CristianCristian – Kaia KanepiKanepi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Alison RiskeRiske (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Lauren DavisDavis (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Arina RodionovaRodionova (1-0) – H2H and prediction