Duje Ajdukovic and Nerman Fatic will square off in the quarter of the Antalya 4 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.8
Duje Ajdukovic -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Duje Ajdukovic vs. Nerman Fatic
This will be the 2nd time that Duje Ajdukovic and Nerman Fatic fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Fatic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Fatic won 6-7(14) 7-5 6-4 in the quarter in M15 Zlatibor back in 2019.
Duje Ajdukovic
Ranked no. 272, the Croatian reached the quarter after beating Yshai Oliel 6-4 1-6 6-4 and Cezar Cretu (ROU) 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Cretu (ROU), Duje recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Ajdukovic scored 95 points vs Cretu (ROU)’s 93. The Croatian was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ajdukovic fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Duje Ajdukovic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Ajdukovic put 52% of his first serves in, winning 67% (34/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (25/47) on the 2nd serve. Duje broke Cretu (ROU) 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Croatian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 2 set in this event to win 49% of the points he played.
Ajdukovic has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 63% of his matches (138-80). 29-22 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Ajdukovic has a composed98-51 match record in the last 4 years on clay.
Ajdukovic’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Napoli Challenger.
Duje has a composed 33-30 win-loss record in 2021, 29-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Antalya 4 Challenger
Nerman Fatic
Ranked no. 308, Nerman got to the quarter after defeating Pol Martin Tiffon 2-6 6-0 6-0 and Vladyslav Orlov w/o.
In the 2nd round, Nerman defeated Orlov (w/o). During the match Fatic and Orlov scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 272 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Bosnian was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Nerman Fatic conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The Bosnian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Prijedor.
The Bosnian has a compiled 36-25 win-loss record in 2021, 29-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ajdukovic | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 57 | 20 |
| Pts | 176-184 | 71-46 |
| Total Points | 360 | 117 |
| Winners | 66 | 20 |
| %Winners | 38% | 28% |
Ajdukovic played 2 matches while Fatic competed in 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Duje Ajdukovic lost 2 sets, while Nerman Fatic lost 1 set. Ajdukovic has played 3 sets more than Fatic (6 vs 3). Therefore, Ajdukovic played 37 games more than Fatic. The Croatian scored 66 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Bosnian managed to score 20 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ajdukovic | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 103/189 | 32/56 |
| %1st in | 54% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 66/103 | 20/32 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 42/86 | 15/24 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 63% |
Ajdukovic recorded 6 aces (3 per match). Fatic recorded 2 aces . Ajdukovic won 64% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ajdukovic | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/19 | 7/11 |
| % Converted | 53% | 64% |
| Conceded | 21 | 3 |
| Saved | 12 | 0 |
| % Saved | 57% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 3 |
The Croatian broke his opponents 10 times with a 53% conversion rate. Ajdukovic lost his serve 9 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Nerman broke his opponent 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ajdukovic | ||||
| R1 Oliel |
R2 Cretu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 30 | 57 | |
| pts | 81-91 | 95-93 | 176-184 | |
| Total points | 172 | 188 | 360 | |
| Winners | 32 | 34 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 36% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 52/91 | 51/98 | 103/189 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 52% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 32/52 | 34/51 | 66/103 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 67% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/39 | 25/47 | 42/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 53% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/11 | 10/19 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 45% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 11 | 21 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 7/11 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 64% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Fatic | ||||
| R1 Martin |
R2 Orlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-0 6-0 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | – | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | – | 20 | |
| pts | 71-46 | – | 71-46 | |
| Total points | 117 | – | 117 | |
| Winners | 20 | – | 20 | |
| %Winners | 28% | – | 28% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | – | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | – | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/56 | – | 32/56 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | – | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 20/32 | – | 20/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | – | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | – | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | – | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | – | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/11 | – | 7/11 | |
| Converted % | 64% | – | 64% | |
| Conceded | 3 | – | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | – | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | – | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLLWWL
WWWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Antalya 4 Challenger
- Sanjar Fayziev/Markos KalovelonisFayziev/Markos Kalovelonis – Riccardo Bonadio/Giovanni FonioBonadio/Giovanni Fonio (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
