Cem Ilkel and Oleg Prihodko will square off in the quarter of the Antalya 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 10:00 am on COURT 12. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.152
Oleg Prihodko -> 5.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Oleg Prihodko
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Oleg Prihodko since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 144 (career-high), the Turk got to the quarter after defeating Ivan Nedelko 6-4 7-5 and Filip Cristian Jianu 6-73 6-4 6-0.
In the 2nd round against Cristian Jianu, The Turk recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-4 6-0). During the match, Ilkel scored 93 points vs Cristian Jianu’s 71. The Turk was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ilkel couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Cem Ilkel lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Ilkel put 55% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the 2nd serve. Cem broke Cristian Jianu 8 times after converting 67% of his break points (8/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Turk started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Ilkel has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (319-228). 13-10 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ilkel has a composed53-54 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Ilkel’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Pozoblanco Challenger and the Bergamo Challenger.
Ilkel has a composed 38-28 win-loss record in 2021, 13-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Antalya 4 Challenger
Oleg Prihodko
Ranked no. 708, Prihodko got to the quarter after defeating Mick Veldheer 1-6 6-3 6-2, Riccardo Bonadio 7-615 6-4 and Duckhee Lee 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Hee Lee (6-3 6-3). During the match Prihodko scored 61 points vs Hee Lee’s 38. Prihodko was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Prihodko managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Oleg Prihodko lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Prihodko put 69% of his first serves in, winning 71% (22/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (7/14) on the 2nd serve. Oleg broke Hee Lee 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ukrainian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The Ukrainian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Telavi.
Oleg has an overall 41-31 win-loss record in 2021, 37-28 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ilkel | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 51 | 65 |
| Pts | 168-132 | 225-185 |
| Total Points | 300 | 410 |
| Winners | 61 | 109 |
| %Winners | 36% | 48% |
Ilkel played 2 matches while Prihodko competed in 3 matches. Prihodko started his run from the qualifications while Ilkel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Cem Ilkel lost 1 set, while Oleg Prihodko lost 1 set. Ilkel has played 2 set(s) less than Prihodko (5 vs 7). Therefore, Ilkel played 14 games less than Prihodko. Cem scored 61 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Ukrainian made 109 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ilkel | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 84/149 | 160/201 |
| %1st in | 56% | 80% |
| 1st pts | 61/84 | 109/160 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 32/65 | 22/41 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 54% |
Ilkel didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Prihodko scored 7 aces (2.3 per match). Ilkel won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Prihodko won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ilkel | Prihodko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 13 |
| Converted | 13/21 | 13/27 |
| % Converted | 62% | 48% |
| Conceded | 16 | 15 |
| Saved | 9 | 7 |
| % Saved | 56% | 47% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 8 |
Cem broke his opponents 13 times with a 62% conversion rate. Cem surrendered his serve 7 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Oleg broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. Oleg conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 47% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ilkel | ||||
| R1 Nedelko |
R2 Cristian |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | 6-73 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 29 | 51 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 93-71 | 168-132 | |
| Total points | 136 | 164 | 300 | |
| Winners | 30 | 31 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 33% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 40/69 | 44/80 | 84/149 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 55% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 31/44 | 61/84 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 70% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/29 | 20/36 | 32/65 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 56% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 8/12 | 13/21 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 67% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 | 16 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 3/7 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 43% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Prihodko | ||||||
| Q1 Veldheer |
Q3 Cretu |
R1 Bonadio |
R2 Hee Lee |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-615 6-4 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 18 | 23 | 18 | 83 | |
| pts | 77-71 | – | 87-76 | 61-38 | 225-185 | |
| Total points | 148 | 0 | 163 | 99 | 410 | |
| Winners | 36 | 51 | 22 | 109 | ||
| %Winners | 47% | 0% | 59% | 36% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||
| 1st in | 60/69 | / | 69/87 | 31/45 | 160/201 | |
| % 1st in | 87% | 0% | 79% | 69% | 80% | |
| 1st pts | 36/60 | / | 51/69 | 22/31 | 109/160 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 0% | 74% | 71% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/9 | / | 10/18 | 7/14 | 22/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 0% | 56% | 50% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 6 | 13 | ||
| Converted | 5/15 | / | 2/3 | 6/9 | 13/27 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | 3 | 15 | ||
| Saved | 2/6 | 0/ | 5/6 | 0/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 33% | – | 83% | 0% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLWW
LWWWWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Antalya 4 Challenger
- Sanjar Fayziev/Markos KalovelonisFayziev/Markos Kalovelonis – Riccardo Bonadio/Giovanni FonioBonadio/Giovanni Fonio (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
