Cem Ilkel and Filip Cristian Jianu will square off in the 2nd round of the Antalya 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 12. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.66
Filip Cristian Jianu -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Filip Cristian Jianu
There is no head to head record between Cem Ilkel and Filip Cristian Jianu since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 144 (career-high), the Turk got to the 2nd round after defeating Ivan Nedelko 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Cem had a good straight sets win against Nedelko (6-4 7-5). During the match, Ilkel scored 75 points vs Nedelko’s 61. Ilkel was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ilkel was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Cem Ilkel lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Ilkel put 58% of his first serves in, winning 75% (30/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (12/29) on the 2nd serve. The Turk broke Nedelko 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Ilkel has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (318-228). 12-10 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ilkel has a compiled52-54 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Cem’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Pozoblanco Challenger and the Bergamo Challenger.
Cem has a composed 37-28 win-loss record in 2021, 12-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Antalya 4 Challenger
Filip Cristian Jianu
Ranked no. 318, will start his run in the Antalya 4 Challenger after he played his last match in the Antalya 4 Challenger where he defeated 6-0 7-5 to Agabigun in the 1st round on the 8th of December.
Filip has an overall 48-37 win-loss record in 2021, 39-26 on clay (See FULL STATS).
The Romanian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Cairo,M15 Antalya and M15 Heraklion.
In terms of his career, Filip has an overall 128-86 record. He has a positive 103-62 record on clay.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ilkel | Cristian |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 75-61 | 65-45 |
| Total Points | 136 | 110 |
| Winners | 30 | 19 |
| %Winners | 40% | 29% |
Both Ilkel and Cristian played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ilkel and Cristian have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ilkel played 4 games more than Cristian. Ilkel scored 30 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian blasted 19 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ilkel | Cristian |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 40/69 | 31/50 |
| %1st in | 58% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 19/31 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 12/29 | 13/19 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 68% |
Ilkel didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cristian managed to score 1 ace . Ilkel won 75% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Cristian won 61% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ilkel | Cristian |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 6/14 |
| % Converted | 56% | 43% |
| Conceded | 9 | 3 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Ilkel broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Cem surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Filip broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Romanian conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ilkel | |||
| R1 Nedelko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 75-61 | 75-61 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/69 | 40/69 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/29 | 12/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Cristian | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWLLLW
LWLWWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Antalya 4 Challenger
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-615 6-4) – See score progression
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mircea-Alexandru JecanJecan – Nick ChappellChappell (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev – Damien WengerWenger (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Marsel IlhanIlhan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Sarp AgabigunAgabigun (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-60 7-60) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Yshai OlielOliel (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Jakub PaulPaul (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Duckhee LeeLee – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Vladyslav OrlovOrlov – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (2-6 6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-6(0) 7-6(0)) – See score progression
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Filip MisolicMisolic (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – Marsel IlhanIlhan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mircea-Alexandru JecanJecan – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Duckhee LeeLee – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cezar Cretu (ROU)Cretu (ROU) – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
