Roberto Cid Subervi and Luciano Darderi will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Montevideo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Roberto Cid Subervi who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Roberto Cid Subervi is the pick to win this match.
Roberto Cid Subervi -> 1.83
Luciano Darderi -> 1.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roberto Cid Subervi vs. Luciano Darderi
There is no head to head record between Roberto Cid Subervi and Luciano Darderi since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Roberto Cid Subervi
Ranked no. 287, Cid got to the qualifications after beating Mariano Navone 4-6 6-3 7-64.
In the qualifications against Navone, Roberto recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-64). During the match, Cid scored 110 points vs Navone’s 107. Cid was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cid scored just 1 ace during the match and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Roberto Cid Subervi lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Cid put 56% of his first serves in, winning 64% (38/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (23/47) on the 2nd serve. Roberto broke Navone 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Cid has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 56% of his matches (190-152). 4-11 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cid has an overall110-84 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Dominican’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Orlando Challenger.
The Dominican has an overall 11-25 win-loss record in 2021, 4-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montevideo Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2018. See his history.
Luciano Darderi
Ranked no. 461 (career-high), Luciano reached the qualifications after beating Felipe Martinez Sarrasague 6-0 6-3.
In the qualifications, Darderi had a good straight sets win against Martinez Sarrasague (6-0 6-3). During the match Darderi scored 59 points vs Martinez Sarrasague’s 29. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Darderi fired 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Luciano Darderi was pretty efficient on serve to win 100% (17/17) of his 1st serve and 75% (12/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Martinez Sarrasague 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Luciano’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Novi Sad.
Luciano has a composed 39-14 win-loss record in 2021, 19-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cid | Darderi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 15 |
| Pts | 110-107 | 59-29 |
| Total Points | 217 | 88 |
| Winners | 38 | 17 |
| %Winners | 35% | 29% |
Both Cid and Darderi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Roberto Cid Subervi dropped 1 set while Luciano Darderi hasn’t conceded a set so far. Cid has played 1 set more than Darderi (3 vs 2). Therefore, Cid played 17 games more than Darderi. Roberto scored 38 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Darderi made 17 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cid | Darderi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 59/106 | 17/33 |
| %1st in | 56% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 38/59 | 17/17 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 100% |
| 2nd pts | 23/47 | 12/16 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 75% |
Cid made 1 ace . Darderi also blasted 9 aces . Cid won 64% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Darderi won 100% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cid | Darderi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 36% | 42% |
| Conceded | 11 | 0 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 55% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Roberto broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Dominican surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. Luciano broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Italian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Cid | |||
| Q1 Navone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 110-107 | 110-107 | |
| Total points | 217 | 217 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 59/106 | 59/106 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 38/59 | 38/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/47 | 23/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Darderi | |||
| Q1 Martinez Sarrasague |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-29 | 59-29 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 17/33 | 17/33 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 17/17 | 17/17 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 100% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 12/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLLWW
LWLWLWWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Pedro CachinCachin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Andrea CollariniCollarini (2-10) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Lipovsek PuchesLipovsek Puches – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-3) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Martin CuevasCuevas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gilbert Soares Klier JuniorSoares Klier Junior – Facundo JuarezJuarez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco LlanesLlanes – Hugo DellienDellien (0-1) – H2H and prediction
