Nicolas Kicker and Daniel Dutra Da Silva will play each other in the 2nd round of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 7:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nicolas Kicker who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nicolas Kicker is the pick to win this match.
Nicolas Kicker -> 1.32
Daniel Dutra Da Silva -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nicolas Kicker vs. Daniel Dutra Da Silva
This will be the 2nd time that Nicolas Kicker and Daniel Dutra Da Silva clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Dutra Da Silva (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Dutra Da Silva won 6-2 6-3 in the 1st round in Chile F1 back in 1970.
Nicolas Kicker
Ranked no. 240, the Argentine got to the 2nd round after beating Sebastian Baez 7-63 4-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Argentine defeated Baez (7-63 4-6 7-5). During the match, Kicker scored 119 points vs Baez’s 108. The Argentine was quite aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kicker wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Nicolas Kicker lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Kicker put 75% of his first serves in, winning 61% (51/83) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (19/28) on the 2nd serve. Nicolas broke Baez 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Kicker has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (277-170). 43-15 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kicker has an overall256-149 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Kicker’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Villa Maria,M25 Pensacola,M25 Santo Domingo,M25 Tulsa and the Tampere Challenger.
Kicker has a compiled 57-16 win-loss record in 2021, 43-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2016. See his history.
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Ranked no. 508, Dutra Da Silva reached the 2nd round after beating Oliver Crawford 6-4 6-3, Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 7-68 6-4 and Nick Hardt 2-6 7-65 6-0.
In the 1st round against Hardt, Dutra Da Silva recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-65 6-0). During the match Dutra Da Silva scored 93 points vs Hardt’s 84. The Brazilian was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Dutra Da Silva blasted 5 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Daniel Dutra Da Silva was very efficient on serve to win 73% (36/49) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Daniel broke Hardt 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Dutra Da Silva’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Lima and M25 Guayaquil.
The Brazilian has a compiled 37-16 win-loss record in 2021, 37-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kicker | Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 69 |
| Pts | 119-108 | 234-213 |
| Total Points | 227 | 447 |
| Winners | 51 | 99 |
| %Winners | 43% | 42% |
Kicker played 1 match while Dutra Da Silva competed in 3 matches. Dutra Da Silva started his run from the qualifications while Kicker had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Nicolas Kicker dropped 1 set, while Daniel Dutra Da Silva conceded 1 set. Kicker has played 4 set(s) less than Dutra Da Silva (3 vs 7). Therefore, Kicker played 34 games less than Dutra Da Silva. The Argentine scored 51 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Dutra Da Silva recorded 99 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kicker | Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 5 |
| 1st in | 83/111 | 138/217 |
| %1st in | 75% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 51/83 | 99/138 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 19/28 | 39/79 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 49% |
Kicker didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Dutra Da Silva managed to score 15 aces (5 per match). Kicker won 61% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Dutra Da Silva won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kicker | Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 11/24 |
| % Converted | 40% | 46% |
| Conceded | 12 | 15 |
| Saved | 8 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 6 |
Nicolas broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Argentine dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponents 11 times with a 46% conversion rate. Dutra Da Silva conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kicker | |||
| R1 Baez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 4-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 119-108 | 119-108 | |
| Total points | 227 | 227 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 83/111 | 83/111 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 51/83 | 51/83 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/28 | 19/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Dutra Da Silva | |||||
| Q1 Crawford |
Q3 Alejandro Dellien Velasco |
R1 Hardt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 7-68 6-4 | 2-6 7-65 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 23 | 27 | 69 | |
| pts | 63-50 | 78-79 | 93-84 | 234-213 | |
| Total points | 113 | 157 | 177 | 447 | |
| Winners | 26 | 37 | 36 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 47% | 39% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 1 | 5 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 32/56 | 57/91 | 49/70 | 138/217 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 63% | 70% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 37/57 | 36/49 | 99/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 65% | 73% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 15/34 | 11/21 | 39/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 44% | 52% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/5 | 4/12 | 11/24 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 60% | 33% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 7 | 4 | 15 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 5/7 | 1/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 71% | 25% | 171% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWL
LLWWWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Guayaquil Challenger
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Darian KingKing (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Hugo DellienDellien (6-1 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Elahi GalanDaniel – Facundo JuarezFacundo (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alejandro GonzalezGonzalez – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Facundo BagnisBagnis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
