Sergiy Stakhovsky and Fabian Marozsan will square off in the 2nd round of the Bergamo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on PALAAGNELLI. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sergiy Stakhovsky who should win in 3 sets.
Sergiy Stakhovsky -> 1.78
Fabian Marozsan -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sergiy Stakhovsky vs. Fabian Marozsan
There is no head to head record between Sergiy Stakhovsky and Fabian Marozsan since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Ranked no. 227, Sergiy reached the 2nd round after defeating Matteo Arnaldi 6-3 6-74 7-65.
In the 1st round, Stakhovsky defeated Arnaldi (6-3 6-74 7-65). During the match, Stakhovsky scored 116 points vs Arnaldi’s 109. Sergiy was extremely aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stakhovsky scored 5 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Sergiy Stakhovsky was very efficient on serve to win 78% (42/54) of his 1st serve and 57% (28/49) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Sergiy broke Arnaldi 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Stakhovsky has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (343-300). 5-5 on indoor hard courts in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Stakhovsky has a composed 112-93 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Sergiy’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Porto Challenger.
Sergiy has an aggregate 22-19 win-loss record in 2021, 5-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bergamo Challenger
The Ukrainian has never competed in this tournament before.
Fabian Marozsan
Ranked no. 415, the Hungarian got to the 2nd round after beating Tobias Kamke 6-1 6-4, Calvin Hemery 7-65 7-64 and Nikola Milojevic 4-6 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round against Milojevic, Fabian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-3). During the match Marozsan scored 83 points vs Milojevic’s 71. Fabian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Marozsan fired 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Fabian Marozsan lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Marozsan put 73% of his first serves in, winning 74% (43/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. The Hungarian broke Milojevic 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
The Hungarian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Bratislava,M15 Antalya,M15 Zilina and M15 Zlatibor.
The Hungarian has an aggregate 44-17 win-loss record in 2021, 8-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Stakhovsky | Marozsan |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 35 | 69 |
Pts | 116-109 | 235-200 |
Total Points | 225 | 435 |
Winners | 42 | 126 |
%Winners | 36% | 54% |
Stakhovsky played 1 match while Marozsan competed in 3 matches. Marozsan started his run from the qualifications while Stakhovsky had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Sergiy Stakhovsky lost 1 set, while Fabian Marozsan lost 1 set. Stakhovsky has played 4 set(s) less than Marozsan (3 vs 7). Therefore, Stakhovsky played 34 games less than Marozsan. The Ukrainian scored 42 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Fabian fired 126 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Stakhovsky | Marozsan |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 16 |
Avg per match | 5 | 5.3 |
1st in | 54/103 | 163/220 |
%1st in | 52% | 74% |
1st pts | 42/54 | 126/163 |
%1st pts | 78% | 77% |
2nd pts | 28/49 | 30/57 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 53% |
Stakhovsky made 5 aces . Marozsan managed to score 16 aces (5.3 per match). Stakhovsky won 78% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Marozsan won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Stakhovsky | Marozsan |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 8 |
Converted | 4/15 | 8/28 |
% Converted | 27% | 29% |
Conceded | 7 | 11 |
Saved | 5 | 9 |
% Saved | 71% | 82% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Sergiy broke his opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. Sergiy lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Marozsan broke his opponents 8 times with a 29% conversion rate. The Hungarian conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
Stakhovsky | |||
R1 Arnaldi | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-74 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
pts | 116-109 | 116-109 | |
Total points | 225 | 225 | |
Winners | 42 | 42 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 54/103 | 54/103 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 42/54 | 42/54 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 28/49 | 28/49 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Marozsan | |||||
Q1 Kamke | Q3 Hemery | R1 Milojevic | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-4 | 7-65 7-64 | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 26 | 69 | |
pts | 63-44 | 89-85 | 83-71 | 235-200 | |
Total points | 107 | 174 | 154 | 435 | |
Winners | 30 | 53 | 43 | 126 | |
%Winners | 48% | 60% | 52% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 3 | 7 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
1st in | 38/55 | 67/85 | 58/80 | 163/220 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 79% | 73% | 74% | |
1st pts | 30/38 | 53/67 | 43/58 | 126/163 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | 74% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/18 | 10/22 | 30/57 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 56% | 45% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 0/7 | 5/12 | 8/28 | |
Converted % | 33% | 0% | 42% | 29% | |
Conceded | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 2/2 | 3/5 | 9 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | 60% | 260% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Tennis Scores in Bergamo Challenger
- Dennis NovakNovak – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (7-64 7-62) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Yannick MadenMaden (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Maxime JanvierJanvier (5-7 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Luca PotenzaPotenza (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Pavel KotovKotov (4-6 6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (4-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Luca NardiNardi (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (6-3 6-74 7-65) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher O’ConnellO’Connell – Yannick MadenMaden (6-3 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Maxime JanvierJanvier (5-7 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (7-6(4) 7-6(2)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Federico GaioGaio – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Mathias BourgueBourgue (1-1) – H2H and prediction