Jordan Thompson and Ruben Bemelmans will play each other in the 2nd round of the Eckental Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jordan Thompson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jordan Thompson is the pick to win this match.
Jordan Thompson -> 1.67
Ruben Bemelmans -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Ruben Bemelmans
This will be the 2nd time that Jordan Thompson and Ruben Bemelmans fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Thompson (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on carpet.
The last time that they locked horns, Thompson won 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in Washington back in 2017.
Jordan Thompson
Ranked no. 68, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Mats Rosenkranz 7-5 6-72 7-65.
In the 1st round, The Australian defeated Rosenkranz (7-5 6-72 7-65). During the match, Thompson scored 130 points vs Rosenkranz’s 123. Jordan was pretty aggressive to blast 59 winners.
Regarding the service games, Thompson bagged 15 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jordan Thompson was pretty efficient on serve to win 75% (59/79) of his 1st serve and 56% (25/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Thompson broke Rosenkranz twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Thompson has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (347-229). 1-1 on carpet in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Thompson has a compiled 5-4 record in the last years on carpet.
The Australian’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Newport.
Jordan has a composed 22-24 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Eckental Challenger
Jordan has never competed in this tournament before.
Ruben Bemelmans
Ranked no. 219, Ruben got to the 2nd round after beating Tobias Simon 6-76 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round against Simon, The Belgian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-76 6-3 7-5). During the match Bemelmans scored 110 points vs Simon’s 93. Bemelmans was quite aggressive to blast 49 winners.
About the serving games, Bemelmans blasted 15 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ruben Bemelmans was very effective on serve to win 84% (49/58) of his 1st serve and 68% (21/31) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ruben broke Simon 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
His best result of the year was conquering the title in the Cherbourg Challenger where he overcame Lukas Rosol in the final 6-4 6-4.
Bemelmans has a compiled 16-19 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Thompson | Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 38 | 34 |
| Pts | 130-123 | 110-93 |
| Total Points | 253 | 203 |
| Winners | 59 | 49 |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% |
Both Thompson and Bemelmans played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Jordan Thompson dropped 1 set, while Ruben Bemelmans surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Thompson and Bemelmans have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Thompson played 4 games more than Bemelmans. Jordan scored 59 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Ruben bagged 49 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Thompson | Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 15 |
| 1st in | 79/124 | 58/89 |
| %1st in | 64% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 59/79 | 49/58 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 25/45 | 21/31 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 68% |
Thompson managed to score 15 aces . Bemelmans scored 15 aces . Thompson won 75% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Bemelmans won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Thompson | Bemelmans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 20% | 33% |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 88% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. The Australian dropped his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Ruben broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Belgian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Thompson | |||
| R1 Rosenkranz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-72 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 38 | 38 | |
| pts | 130-123 | 130-123 | |
| Total points | 253 | 253 | |
| Winners | 59 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 79/124 | 79/124 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 59/79 | 59/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/45 | 25/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Bemelmans | |||
| R1 Simon |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-76 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 110-93 | 110-93 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 58/89 | 58/89 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 49/58 | 49/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/31 | 21/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLLL
Tennis Scores in Eckental Challenger
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Matthias BachingerBachinger (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Tobias SimonSimon (6-76 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Christopher HeymanHeyman (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Kacper ZukZuk (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Evan FurnessFurness (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Marvin MoellerMoeller (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Jack DraperDraper (7-65 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Marius CopilCopil – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (2-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (7-5 6-72 7-65) – See score progression
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Jurij RodionovRodionov (5-7 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Jiri VeselyVesely – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-1 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Kacper ZukZuk (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Johannes HaerteisHaerteis (6-7(1) 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Evan FurnessFurness (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Daniel MasurMasur (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Lukas LackoLacko (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Julian LenzLenz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-0) – H2H and prediction
