![Prediction And Head To Head Facundo Juarez Vs. Juan Bautista Torres Xgvrzgtclg Prediction and head to head Facundo Juarez vs. Juan Bautista Torres](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Facundo-Juarez-vs.-Juan-Bautista-Torres-xGVrzgTclg.jpg)
Facundo Juarez and Juan Bautista Torres will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on CANCHA RAUL VIVER. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Facundo Juarez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Facundo Juarez is the pick to win this match.
Facundo Juarez -> 1.69
Juan Bautista Torres -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Facundo Juarez vs. Juan Bautista Torres
This will be the 3rd time that Facundo Juarez and Juan Bautista Torres square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Juarez (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Juarez won 6-3 6-0 in the semifinal in M25 Guayaquil back in October 2021.
Facundo Juarez
Ranked no. 486 (career-high), the Argentine got to the qualifications after defeating Miguel Mateo Larrea 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Juarez had a good straight sets win against Mateo Larrea (6-1 6-0). During the match, Juarez scored 55 points vs Mateo Larrea’s 26. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Juarez fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Facundo Juarez was pretty effective on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 56% (5/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Facundo broke Mateo Larrea 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Juarez has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (180-96). 59-25 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Juarez has a compiled172-89 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
Facundo’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Cordoba,M15 Antalya,M15 Curtea de Arges and M25 Guayaquil.
Juarez has an aggregate 59-25 win-loss record in 2021, 59-25 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Juan Bautista Torres
Ranked no. 581, Juan reached the qualifications after defeating Cristian Rodriguez 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Juan had a good straight sets win against Rodriguez (6-2 6-2). During the match Bautista scored 63 points vs Rodriguez’s 36. Bautista was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Bautista was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Juan Bautista Torres was quite effective on serve to win 92% (24/26) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Argentine broke Rodriguez 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Juan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Cairo.
Juan has an aggregate 32-20 win-loss record in 2021, 20-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Juarez | Bautista |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 13 | 16 |
Pts | 55-26 | 63-36 |
Total Points | 81 | 99 |
Winners | 22 | 24 |
%Winners | 40% | 38% |
Both Juarez and Bautista played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Juarez and Bautista have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Juarez played 3 games less than Bautista. Juarez scored 22 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine scored 24 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Juarez | Bautista |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 0 |
Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
1st in | 29/38 | 26/39 |
%1st in | 76% | 67% |
1st pts | 22/29 | 24/26 |
%1st pts | 76% | 92% |
2nd pts | 5/9 | 8/13 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 62% |
Juarez recorded 3 aces . Bautista didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Juarez won 76% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Bautista won 92% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Juarez | Bautista |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 4 |
Converted | 6/9 | 4/11 |
% Converted | 67% | 36% |
Conceded | 3 | 0 |
Saved | 3 | 0 |
% Saved | 100% | NAN% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Facundo broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Argentine very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Argentine broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Bautista was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Juarez | |||
Q1 Mateo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
pts | 55-26 | 55-26 | |
Total points | 81 | 81 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 29/38 | 29/38 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
1st pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Bautista | |||
Q1 Rodriguez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 63-36 | 63-36 | |
Total points | 99 | 99 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 24/26 | 24/26 | |
% 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Pedja KrstinKrstin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Facundo BagnisBagnis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Roberto CidCid (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alejandro GonzalezGonzalez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Nicolas KickerKicker (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza – Darian KingKing (0-0) – H2H and prediction