Jeff Wolf and Michael Mmoh will play each other in the semifinal of the Las Vegas Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jeff Wolf who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jeff Wolf is the pick to win this match.
Jeff Wolf -> 1.65
Michael Mmoh -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jeff Wolf vs. Michael Mmoh
This will be the 2nd time that Jeff Wolf and Michael Mmoh play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Wolf (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Wolf won 6-2 6-2 in the 3rd round in the Columbus Challenger back in 2019.
Jeff Wolf
Ranked no. 195, Jeff got to the semifinal after beating Shintaro Mochizuki 6-3 7-5, Denis Kudla 4-6 6-3 6-0 and Ernesto Escobedo 6-3 6-3.
In the quarter, Jeff had a good straight sets win against Escobedo (6-3 6-3). During the match, Wolf scored 58 points vs Escobedo’s 42. The American was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wolf blasted 17 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jeff Wolf conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 70% of his first serves in, win 91% (32/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (6/15) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Escobedo 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Wolf has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (85-58). 5-7 on hard in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Wolf has a composed45-34 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Wolf’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Columbus Challenger.
Jeff has a composed 8-8 win-loss record in 2021, 5-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019. See his history.
Michael Mmoh
Ranked no. 224, Mmoh got to the semifinal after defeating Nick Chappell 6-2 6-1, Aleksandar Vukic 6-4 6-4 and Mikael Torpegaard 6-1 6-75 6-1.
In the quarter, Mmoh defeated Torpegaard (6-1 6-75 6-1). During the match Mmoh scored 89 points vs Torpegaard’s 61. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Mmoh fired 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Michael Mmoh was quite efficient on serve to win 80% (40/50) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Michael broke Torpegaard 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Michael started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 59% of the points he played.
The American has an aggregate 13-13 win-loss record in 2021, 11-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wolf | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 64 | 62 |
| Pts | 226-176 | 214-146 |
| Total Points | 402 | 360 |
| Winners | 102 | 86 |
| %Winners | 45% | 40% |
Both Wolf and Mmoh played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jeff Wolf conceded 1 set, while Michael Mmoh conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Wolf and Mmoh have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Wolf played 2 games more than Mmoh. Jeff scored 102 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 86 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wolf | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 41 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 13.7 | 3 |
| 1st in | 129/218 | 114/172 |
| %1st in | 59% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 102/129 | 86/114 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 43/89 | 36/58 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 62% |
Wolf scored 41 aces (13.7 per match). Mmoh fired 9 aces (3 per match). Wolf won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Mmoh won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wolf | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 14 |
| Converted | 12/21 | 14/24 |
| % Converted | 57% | 58% |
| Conceded | 18 | 6 |
| Saved | 14 | 3 |
| % Saved | 78% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Wolf broke his opponents 12 times with a 57% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. Mmoh conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wolf | |||||
| R1 Mochizuki |
R2 Kudla |
1/4 Escobedo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 25 | 18 | 64 | |
| pts | 83-70 | 85-64 | 58-42 | 226-176 | |
| Total points | 153 | 149 | 100 | 402 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | 32 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% | 55% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 18 | 17 | 41 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 6 | 2 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 47/85 | 47/83 | 35/50 | 129/218 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 57% | 70% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | 32/35 | 102/129 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | 91% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/38 | 18/36 | 6/15 | 43/89 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | 40% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 6/7 | 3/6 | 12/21 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 86% | 50% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 6/9 | 0/0 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 67% | – | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
| Mmoh | |||||
| R1 Chappell |
R2 Vukic |
1/4 Torpegaard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 6-75 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 27 | 62 | |
| pts | 63-35 | 62-50 | 89-61 | 214-146 | |
| Total points | 98 | 112 | 150 | 360 | |
| Winners | 17 | 29 | 40 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 47% | 45% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 24/40 | 40/53 | 50/79 | 114/172 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 75% | 63% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 17/24 | 29/40 | 40/50 | 86/114 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 73% | 80% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 9/13 | 15/29 | 36/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 69% | 52% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 3/5 | 5/8 | 14/24 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 60% | 63% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/2 | 0/1 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 0% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLLW
LLLWWLLLLW Tennis Scores in Las Vegas Challenger
- Jeff WolfWolf – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Taro DanielDaniel (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (6-1 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Emilio GomezGomez (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Michael Mmoh/Dennis NovikovMmoh/Dennis Novikov (7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Emilio GomezGomez (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Taro DanielDaniel (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jeff WolfWolf – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jeff WolfWolf (0-1) – H2H and prediction
