Lukas Lacko and Matthias Bachinger will play each other in the quarter of the Ismaning Challenger for the 9th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 5:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matthias Bachinger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matthias Bachinger is the pick to win this match.
Matthias Bachinger -> 1.72
Lukas Lacko -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lukas Lacko vs. Matthias Bachinger
This will be the 9th time that Lukas Lacko and Matthias Bachinger fight against each other. The head to head is 6-2 for Lacko (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on carpet.
The last time that they locked horns, Lacko won 7-6(4) 7-6(6) in the 2nd round in the Helsinki Challenger back in 2013.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 212, the Slovakian got to the quarter after beating Marius Copil 7-68 7-64 and Tomas Machac 6-72 6-4 7-62.
In the 2nd round against Machac, Lacko recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 6-4 7-62).-109) than Machac. In fact, the world no. 212 won 109 points vs Machac’s. That means that Lacko was more focused during the important points. Lacko was pretty aggressive to blast 56 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lacko bagged 15 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Lukas Lacko lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lacko put 63% of his first serves in, winning 80% (56/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (18/41) on the 2nd serve. Lukas broke Machac twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Slovakian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 1 set in this event to win 50% of the points he played.
Lacko has a favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (301-253). 2-0 on carpet in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lacko has an aggregate 25-11 win-loss record in the last years on carpet.
His best result of the season was winning the title in the Mallorca Challenger where he beat Yasutaka Uchiyama in the final 5-7 7-6(8) 6-1.
The Slovakian has a compiled 15-20 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2019. See his history.
Matthias Bachinger
Ranked no. 269, Matthias got to the quarter after defeating Michael Weindl 6-1 6-3, Hiroki Moriya 6-3 6-2, Altug Celikbilek 6-3 6-1 and Tim Van Rijthoven 6-74 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Van Rijthoven, The German recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-4 6-2). During the match Bachinger scored 103 points vs Van Rijthoven’s 92. Bachinger was exceptionally aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Bachinger recorded 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Matthias Bachinger was exceptionally effective on serve to win 85% (47/55) of his 1st serve and 58% (25/43) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Van Rijthoven 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The German’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Biella 4 Challenger.
Bachinger has a composed 22-15 win-loss record in 2021, 4-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2017 and 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lacko | Bachinger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 62 | 80 |
| Pts | 194-196 | 278-209 |
| Total Points | 390 | 487 |
| Winners | 94 | 112 |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% |
Lacko played 2 matches while Bachinger competed in 4 matches. Bachinger started his run from the qualifications while Lacko had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Lukas Lacko lost 1 set, while Matthias Bachinger surrendered 1 set. Lacko has played 4 set(s) less than Bachinger (5 vs 9). Therefore, Lacko played 18 games less than Bachinger. Lukas scored 94 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Matthias recorded 112 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lacko | Bachinger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 22 | 34 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 8.5 |
| 1st in | 119/200 | 142/241 |
| %1st in | 60% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 94/119 | 112/142 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 38/81 | 55/99 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 56% |
Lacko made 22 aces (11 per match). Bachinger recorded 34 aces (8.5 per match). Lacko won 79% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Bachinger won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lacko | Bachinger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 18 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 18/29 |
| % Converted | 40% | 62% |
| Conceded | 9 | 18 |
| Saved | 6 | 14 |
| % Saved | 67% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
The Slovakian broke his opponents 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Slovakian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 18 times with a 62% conversion rate. Matthias conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lacko | ||||
| R1 Copil |
R2 Machac |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-68 7-64 | 6-72 6-4 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 36 | 62 | |
| pts | 85-86 | 109-110 | 194-196 | |
| Total points | 171 | 219 | 390 | |
| Winners | 38 | 56 | 94 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 51% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 15 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 7 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 49/89 | 70/111 | 119/200 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 63% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 38/49 | 56/70 | 94/119 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 80% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 18/41 | 38/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 44% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/7 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 29% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 2/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Bachinger | ||||||
| Q1 Weindl |
Q3 Moriya |
R1 Celikbilek |
R2 Van Rijthoven |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-1 | 6-74 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 16 | 31 | 80 | |
| pts | 52-33 | 61-43 | 62-41 | 103-92 | 278-209 | |
| Total points | 85 | 104 | 103 | 195 | 487 | |
| Winners | 24 | 20 | 21 | 47 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 33% | 34% | 46% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 34 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 33/54 | 24/45 | 55/98 | 142/241 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 61% | 53% | 56% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 20/33 | 21/24 | 47/55 | 112/142 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 61% | 88% | 85% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 11/21 | 12/21 | 25/43 | 55/99 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 52% | 57% | 58% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 18 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 6/7 | 4/10 | 3/7 | 18/29 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 86% | 40% | 43% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 18 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 2/2 | 9/9 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 40% | 100% | 100% | 145% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Lukas LackoLacko (2-6) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Maximilian MartererMarterer (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Kacper ZukZuk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Quentin HalysHalys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
