Tim Van Rijthoven and Matthias Bachinger will face off in the 2nd round of the Ismaning Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 8:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tim Van Rijthoven who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tim Van Rijthoven is the pick to win this match.
Tim Van Rijthoven -> 1.77
Matthias Bachinger -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tim Van Rijthoven vs. Matthias Bachinger
There is no head to head record between Tim Van Rijthoven and Matthias Bachinger since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tim Van Rijthoven
Ranked no. 237 (career-high), Van Rijthoven reached the 2nd round after defeating Yannick Hanfmann 5-7 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round against Hanfmann, Van Rijthoven recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-64 6-4). During the match, Van Rijthoven scored 107 points vs Hanfmann’s 106. Van Rijthoven was very aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van Rijthoven scored 14 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Tim Van Rijthoven was extremely effective on serve to win 76% (54/71) of his 1st serve and 53% (18/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Dutch broke Hanfmann twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Van Rijthoven has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 64% of his matches (193-107). 1-0 on carpet in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van Rijthoven has a compiled6-2 match record in the last 8 years on carpet.
The Dutch’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Biel and the Segovia Challenger.
Tim has a composed 37-18 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Van Rijthoven has never competed in this tournament before.
Matthias Bachinger
Ranked no. 269, Bachinger reached the 2nd round after defeating Michael Weindl 6-1 6-3, Hiroki Moriya 6-3 6-2 and Altug Celikbilek 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Bachinger had a good straight sets win against Celikbilek (6-3 6-1). During the match Bachinger scored 62 points vs Celikbilek’s 41. Matthias was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Bachinger managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Matthias Bachinger was very effective on serve to win 88% (21/24) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Matthias broke Celikbilek 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The German’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Biella 4 Challenger.
The German has a compiled 21-15 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2017 and 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van Rijthoven | Bachinger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 49 |
| Pts | 107-106 | 175-117 |
| Total Points | 213 | 292 |
| Winners | 54 | 65 |
| %Winners | 50% | 37% |
Van Rijthoven played 1 match while Bachinger competed in 3 matches. Bachinger started his run from the qualifications while Van Rijthoven had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tim Van Rijthoven conceded 1 set while Matthias Bachinger hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van Rijthoven has played 3 set(s) less than Bachinger (3 vs 6). Therefore, Van Rijthoven played 14 games less than Bachinger. Van Rijthoven scored 54 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, The German recorded 65 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van Rijthoven | Bachinger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 14 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 71/105 | 87/143 |
| %1st in | 68% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 54/71 | 65/87 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 18/34 | 30/56 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 54% |
Van Rijthoven fired 14 aces . Bachinger made 22 aces (7.3 per match). Van Rijthoven won 76% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Bachinger won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van Rijthoven | Bachinger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 15 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 15/22 |
| % Converted | 20% | 68% |
| Conceded | 3 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 33% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Van Rijthoven broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Bachinger broke his opponents 15 times with a 68% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van Rijthoven | |||
| R1 Hanfmann |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 107-106 | 107-106 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 54 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 71/105 | 71/105 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 54/71 | 54/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/34 | 18/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Bachinger | |||||
| Q1 Weindl |
Q3 Moriya |
R1 Celikbilek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 16 | 49 | |
| pts | 52-33 | 61-43 | 62-41 | 175-117 | |
| Total points | 85 | 104 | 103 | 292 | |
| Winners | 24 | 20 | 21 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 33% | 34% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 7 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 30/44 | 33/54 | 24/45 | 87/143 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 61% | 53% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 20/33 | 21/24 | 65/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 61% | 88% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 11/21 | 12/21 | 30/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 52% | 57% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/5 | 6/7 | 4/10 | 15/22 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 86% | 40% | 68% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 2/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 40% | 100% | 190% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LL
Tennis Scores in Ismaning Challenger
- Julian LenzLenz – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-75 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Jiri VeselyVesely (7-68 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-72 6-2 7-60) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Jordan ThompsonThompson (5-7 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (5-7 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Marius CopilCopil (7-68 7-64) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Tobias KamkeKamke (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Daniel MasurMasur (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Jordan ThompsonThompson (5-7 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Jiri VeselyVesely (7-6(8) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas LackoLacko – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Yannick MadenMaden (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Robin HaaseHaase (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Matthias BachingerBachinger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Andreas SeppiSeppi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
