Botic Van De Zandschulp and Evgeny Donskoy will face off in the qualifications of the St. Petersburg Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.36
Evgeny Donskoy -> 3.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Evgeny Donskoy
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Evgeny Donskoy since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 61 (career-high), the Dutch reached the qualifications after beating Marc Polmans 6-6 ret..
In the qualifications, Botic defeated Polmans (6-6 ret.). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 46 points vs Polmans’s 45. The Dutch was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 67% of his first serves in, winning 63% (20/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (6/16) on the 2nd serve. Van De Zandschulp broke Polmans twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (242-118). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has a composed61-27 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Van De Zandschulp’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Amersfoort Challenger.
Botic has an overall 47-21 win-loss record in 2021, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in St. Petersburg
Botic has never competed in this tournament before.
Evgeny Donskoy
Ranked no. 149, the Russian reached the qualifications after defeating Mikael Ymer 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, Evgeny had a good straight sets win against Ymer (6-2 7-5). During the match Donskoy scored 77 points vs Ymer’s 64. Evgeny was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Donskoy fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Evgeny Donskoy lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Donskoy put 56% of his first serves in, winning 72% (31/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. Evgeny broke Ymer 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Donskoy’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Biella 2 Challenger.
Donskoy has a composed 18-26 win-loss record in 2021, 6-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in St. Petersburg
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2010, 2013, 2015, 2019 and 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Van De Zandschulp | Donskoy |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 12 | 20 |
Pts | 46-45 | 77-64 |
Total Points | 91 | 141 |
Winners | 20 | 31 |
%Winners | 43% | 40% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Donskoy played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Donskoy have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van De Zandschulp played 8 games less than Donskoy. Van De Zandschulp scored 20 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Donskoy blasted 31 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Donskoy |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 3 |
Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
1st in | 32/48 | 43/77 |
%1st in | 67% | 56% |
1st pts | 20/32 | 31/43 |
%1st pts | 63% | 72% |
2nd pts | 6/16 | 17/34 |
%2nd pts | 38% | 50% |
Van De Zandschulp struck 1 ace . Donskoy also managed to score 3 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 63% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Donskoy won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Donskoy |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 4 |
Converted | 2/5 | 4/7 |
% Converted | 40% | 57% |
Conceded | 6 | 2 |
Saved | 4 | 1 |
% Saved | 67% | 50% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Botic lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Evgeny broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Donskoy conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Van De Zandschulp | |||
Q1 Polmans |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-6 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
pts | 46-45 | 46-45 | |
Total points | 91 | 91 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 20/32 | 20/32 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Donskoy | |||
Q1 Ymer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 77-64 | 77-64 | |
Total points | 141 | 141 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 43/77 | 43/77 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 31/43 | 31/43 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 17/34 | 17/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – Yshai OlielOliel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico DelbonisDelbonis – Pablo AndujarAndujar (2-6) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Tommy PaulPaul (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Sebastian KordaKorda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (1-1) – H2H and prediction