Jelena Ostapenko and Shelby Rogers will clash against each other in the quarter of the BNP Paribas Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jelena Ostapenko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jelena Ostapenko is the pick to win this match.
Jelena Ostapenko -> 1.615
Shelby Rogers -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jelena Ostapenko vs. Shelby Rogers
This will be the 3rd time that Jelena Ostapenko and Shelby Rogers square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Ostapenko (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Ostapenko won 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) in the 2nd round in Charleston back in 2019.
Jelena Ostapenko
Ranked no. 29, the Latvian reached the quarter after beating Su-Wei Hsieh 6-3 6-0, Yulia Putintseva 6-3 2-6 6-3 and Iga Swiatek 6-4 6-3.
In the 4th round, Ostapenko had a good straight sets win against Swiatek (6-4 6-3). During the match, Ostapenko scored 63 points vs Swiatek’s 54. The Latvian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ostapenko couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Jelena Ostapenko lost the serve twice and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Ostapenko put 55% of her first serves in, winning 65% (22/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the 2nd serve. Jelena broke Swiatek 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jelena started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points she played.
Ostapenko has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of her matches (289-177). 11-8 on hard in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Ostapenko has an aggregate 82-75 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Her best result of the year was winning the title in in Eastbourne where she beat Anett Kontaveit in the final 6-3 6-3.
Jelena has a compiled 31-17 win-loss record in 2021, 11-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2018 and 2019. See her history.
Shelby Rogers
Ranked no. 44, Shelby got to the quarter after beating Anhelina Kalinina 7-62 6-2, Kristina Kucova 6-2 6-2, Irina-Camelia Begu 6-0 6-2 and Leylah Annie Fernandez 2-6 6-1 7-64.
In the 4th round against Annie Fernandez, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-1 7-64). During the match Rogers scored 114 points vs Annie Fernandez’s 107. The American was quite aggressive to blast 45 winners.
About the serving games, Rogers recorded 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Shelby Rogers lost the serve 4 times and she saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Rogers put 67% of her first serves in, winning 64% (45/70) of the points behind her 1st serve and 37% (13/35) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Annie Fernandez 5 times after converting 31% of her break points (5/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points she played.
Shelby has an overall 29-21 win-loss record in 2021, 20-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Indian Wells
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2014, 2016 and 2017. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ostapenko | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 79 |
| Pts | 213-174 | 326-256 |
| Total Points | 387 | 582 |
| Winners | 81 | 127 |
| %Winners | 38% | 39% |
Ostapenko played 3 matches while Rogers competed in 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jelena Ostapenko surrendered 1 set, while Shelby Rogers conceded 1 set. Ostapenko has played 2 set(s) less than Rogers (7 vs 9). Therefore, Ostapenko played 19 games less than Rogers. Ostapenko scored 81 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Rogers struck 127 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ostapenko | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 127/202 | 185/282 |
| %1st in | 63% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 81/127 | 127/185 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 39/75 | 41/97 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 42% |
Ostapenko made 3 aces (1 per match). Rogers fired 9 aces (2.3 per match). Ostapenko won 64% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Rogers won 69% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ostapenko | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 21 |
| Converted | 15/28 | 21/44 |
| % Converted | 54% | 48% |
| Conceded | 24 | 26 |
| Saved | 16 | 17 |
| % Saved | 67% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 9 |
The Latvian broke her opponents 15 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Latvian conceded her serve 8 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponents 21 times with a 48% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 9 times and she saved 65% of the break points that she conceded.
| Ostapenko | |||||
| R2 Hsieh |
R3 Putintseva |
R4 Swiatek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 26 | 19 | 60 | |
| pts | 58-34 | 92-86 | 63-54 | 213-174 | |
| Total points | 92 | 178 | 117 | 387 | |
| Winners | 21 | 38 | 22 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 41% | 35% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 63/89 | 34/62 | 127/202 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 71% | 55% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 21/30 | 38/63 | 22/34 | 81/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 60% | 65% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 11/26 | 16/28 | 39/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 42% | 57% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 6/12 | 4/7 | 15/28 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 50% | 57% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 | 8 | 24 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 6/11 | 6/8 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 55% | 75% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | |
| Rogers | ||||||
| R1 Kalinina |
R2 Kucova |
R3 Begu |
R4 Annie |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-0 6-2 | 2-6 6-1 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 16 | 14 | 28 | 79 | |
| pts | 101-82 | 54-31 | 57-36 | 114-107 | 326-256 | |
| Total points | 183 | 85 | 93 | 221 | 582 | |
| Winners | 39 | 22 | 21 | 45 | 127 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% | 37% | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 63/94 | 29/40 | 23/43 | 70/105 | 185/282 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 73% | 53% | 67% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 39/63 | 22/29 | 21/23 | 45/70 | 127/185 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 76% | 91% | 64% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 6/11 | 9/20 | 13/35 | 41/97 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 55% | 45% | 37% | 42% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 21 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 5/16 | 21/44 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 100% | 50% | 31% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 26 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 10/14 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 0% | 100% | 71% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWWW
LLLLLLWLWL Tennis Scores in Indian Wells
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Cori GauffGauff (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Angelique KerberKerber – Daria KasatkinaKasatkina (6-2 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (1-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Beatriz Haddad MaiaHaddad Maia – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Shelby RogersRogers – Irina-Camelia BeguBegu (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Simona HalepHalep (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (4-6 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Petra KvitovaKvitova (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Ons JabeurJabeur (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Angelique KerberKerber (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka – Jessica PegulaPegula (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (0-2) – H2H and prediction
