Renzo Olivo and Johan Nikles will face off in the quarter of the Lima Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Renzo Olivo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Renzo Olivo is the pick to win this match.
Renzo Olivo -> 1.62
Johan Nikles -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Renzo Olivo vs. Johan Nikles
There is no head to head record between Renzo Olivo and Johan Nikles since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Renzo Olivo
Ranked no. 203, Olivo reached the quarter after defeating Lucas Catarina 6-4 6-4 and Roberto Quiroz 7-5 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Quiroz (7-5 6-4). During the match, Olivo scored 71 points vs Quiroz’s 55. Renzo was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Olivo couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Renzo Olivo lost the serve 4 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Olivo put 75% of his first serves in, winning 63% (29/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Quiroz 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Renzo started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Olivo has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (290-270). 18-20 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Olivo has an overall 256-216 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Renzo’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Ostrava Challenger.
Renzo has an aggregate 20-26 win-loss record in 2021, 18-20 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lima Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2012, 2016 and 2020. See his history.
Johan Nikles
Ranked no. 380 (career-high), Johan reached the quarter after beating Gianluca Ballotta 6-0 6-3, Oscar Jose Gutierrez 6-4 6-2, Adrian Menendez-Maceiras 6-4 6-2 and Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida 7-62 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Johan had a good straight sets win against Pucinelli De Almeida (7-62 6-4). During the match Nikles scored 81 points vs Pucinelli De Almeida’s 71. Johan was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Nikles scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Johan Nikles lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Nikles put 75% of his first serves in, winning 57% (36/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Pucinelli De Almeida 5 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nikles started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 57% of the points he played.
The Swiss’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Majadahonda and M15 Genova.
Nikles has a composed 39-21 win-loss record in 2021, 37-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lima Challenger
Johan has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Olivo | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 42 | 74 |
| Pts | 138-112 | 303-232 |
| Total Points | 250 | 535 |
| Winners | 57 | 120 |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% |
Olivo played 2 matches while Nikles competed in 4 matches. Nikles started his run from the qualifications while Olivo had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Olivo has played 4 set(s) less than Nikles (4 vs 8). Therefore, Olivo played 32 games less than Nikles. Olivo scored 57 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Johan struck 120 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Olivo | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0.8 |
| 1st in | 87/127 | 190/273 |
| %1st in | 69% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 57/87 | 120/190 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 21/40 | 43/83 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 52% |
Olivo didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nikles managed to score 3 aces (0.8 per match). Olivo won 66% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Nikles won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Olivo | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 21 |
| Converted | 10/17 | 21/34 |
| % Converted | 59% | 62% |
| Conceded | 12 | 34 |
| Saved | 6 | 24 |
| % Saved | 50% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 10 |
The Argentine broke his opponents 10 times with a 59% conversion rate. Renzo conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Johan broke his opponents 21 times with a 62% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Olivo | ||||
| R1 Catarina |
R2 Quiroz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 22 | 42 | |
| pts | 67-57 | 71-55 | 138-112 | |
| Total points | 124 | 126 | 250 | |
| Winners | 28 | 29 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/66 | 46/61 | 87/127 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 75% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 28/41 | 29/46 | 57/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 63% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | 8/15 | 21/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 6/9 | 10/17 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 67% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 1/5 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 20% | 46% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Nikles | ||||||
| Q1 Ballotta |
Q3 Jose Gutierrez |
R1 Menendez-Maceiras |
R2 Pucinelli De Almeida |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 18 | 23 | 74 | |
| pts | 60-35 | 76-58 | 86-68 | 81-71 | 303-232 | |
| Total points | 95 | 134 | 154 | 152 | 535 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 32 | 36 | 120 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | 37% | 44% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 46/61 | 50/80 | 63/84 | 190/273 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 75% | 63% | 75% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 29/46 | 32/50 | 36/63 | 120/190 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 63% | 64% | 57% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 7/15 | 15/30 | 11/21 | 43/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 47% | 50% | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 21 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 6/12 | 5/8 | 5/5 | 21/34 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 50% | 63% | 100% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 34 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 5/8 | 10/12 | 6/10 | 24 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 63% | 83% | 60% | 141% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWL
LWWWWLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Hugo DellienDellien (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (2-2) – H2H and prediction
