Juan Pablo Varillas and Eduard Esteve Lobato will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Lima Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 3:00 pm on CENTRAL. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Pablo Varillas who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juan Pablo Varillas is the pick to win this match.
Juan Pablo Varillas -> 1.42
Eduard Esteve Lobato -> 2.875
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Varillas vs. Eduard Esteve Lobato
This will be the 2nd time that Juan Pablo Varillas and Eduard Esteve Lobato square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Esteve Lobato (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Esteve Lobato won 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in Spain F1 back in 2016.
Juan Pablo Varillas
Ranked no. 117 (career-high), Juan reached the 2nd round after defeating Pedro Sakamoto 6-1 0-0 ret..
In the 1st round, Juan defeated Sakamoto (6-1 0-0 ret.). During the match, Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 28 points vs Sakamoto’s 15. The Peruvian was pretty aggressive to blast 12 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pablo Patino-Samudio bagged 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Juan Pablo Varillas was quite effective on serve to win 86% (12/14) of his 1st serve and 57% (4/7) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Pablo Patino-Samudio broke Sakamoto twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (295-190). 37-14 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Pablo Patino-Samudio has a composed265-162 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title in the Biella 5 Challenger where he defeated Guido Andreozzi in the final 6-3 6-1.
Pablo Patino-Samudio has an overall 37-17 win-loss record in 2021, 37-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lima Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2019. See his history.
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Ranked no. 371, Eduard reached the 2nd round after defeating Jorge Brian Panta Herreros 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Esteve Lobato had a good straight sets win against Brian Panta Herreros (6-2 6-1). During the match Esteve Lobato scored 63 points vs Brian Panta Herreros’s 39. Esteve Lobato was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Esteve Lobato made 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Eduard Esteve Lobato was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Esteve Lobato broke Brian Panta Herreros 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Eduard’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Frankfurt am Main.
The Spaniard has a composed 28-14 win-loss record in 2021, 28-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lima Challenger
The Spaniard has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Esteve Lobato |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 7 | 15 |
| Pts | 28-15 | 63-39 |
| Total Points | 43 | 102 |
| Winners | 12 | 28 |
| %Winners | 43% | 44% |
Both Pablo Patino-Samudio and Esteve Lobato played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Pablo Patino-Samudio has played 1 set more than Esteve Lobato (3 vs 2). However, it’s interesting to notice that Pablo Patino-Samudio played 8 games less than Esteve Lobato. Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 12 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Eduard bagged 28 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Esteve Lobato |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 14/21 | 35/52 |
| %1st in | 67% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 12/14 | 28/35 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 4/7 | 9/17 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 53% |
Pablo Patino-Samudio recorded 4 aces . Esteve Lobato fired 3 aces . Pablo Patino-Samudio won 86% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Esteve Lobato won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Esteve Lobato |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 67% | 36% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Pablo Patino-Samudio broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Juan pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Spaniard broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Esteve Lobato was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Pablo Patino-Samudio | |||
| R1 Sakamoto |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 0-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 7 | 7 | |
| pts | 28-15 | 28-15 | |
| Total points | 43 | 43 | |
| Winners | 12 | 12 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 12/14 | 12/14 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Esteve Lobato | |||
| R1 Brian Panta Herreros |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 63-39 | 63-39 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 35/52 | 35/52 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 28/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWLW
Tennis Scores in Lima Challenger
- Hugo DellienDellien – Facundo MenaMena (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (2-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Johan NiklesNikles – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Renzo OlivoRenzo – Roberto QuirozRoberto (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gerald MelzerMelzer – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Hugo DellienDellien (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Julian LenzLenz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
