![Prediction And Head To Head Yshai Oliel Vs. Elmar Ejupovic Dlhcraqa9w Prediction and head to head Yshai Oliel vs. Elmar Ejupovic](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Yshai-Oliel-vs.-Elmar-Ejupovic-dlhCrAQa9W.jpg)
Yshai Oliel and Elmar Ejupovic will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Sibiu Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yshai Oliel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yshai Oliel is the pick to win this match.
Yshai Oliel -> 1.64
Elmar Ejupovic -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yshai Oliel vs. Elmar Ejupovic
There is no head to head record between Yshai Oliel and Elmar Ejupovic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Yshai Oliel
Ranked no. 401, the Israeli got to the qualifications after defeating Sebastian Gima 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Yshai had a good straight sets win against Gima (6-4 6-4). During the match, Oliel scored 61 points vs Gima’s 50. Yshai was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Oliel wasn’t able to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Yshai Oliel lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Oliel put 67% of his first serves in, winning 83% (30/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. The Israeli broke Gima 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Oliel has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (168-95). 19-9 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Oliel has a composed53-34 record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Israeli’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Ramat Hasharon,M25 Frankfurt am Main,M25+H Bacau and M25 Ricany.
Oliel has a compiled 36-19 win-loss record in 2021, 19-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
The Israeli has never competed in this tournament before.
Elmar Ejupovic
Ranked no. 411, Elmar reached the qualifications after defeating Vlad Andrei Dumitru 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Elmar had a good straight sets win against Andrei Dumitru (6-2 6-2). During the match Ejupovic scored 62 points vs Andrei Dumitru’s 39. Elmar was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Ejupovic wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (18/24) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Elmar broke Andrei Dumitru 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Ejupovic’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Grenoble,M25 Trimbach and M15 Troisdorf.
The German has an aggregate 28-17 win-loss record in 2021, 19-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Oliel | Ejupovic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
Pts | 61-50 | 62-39 |
Total Points | 111 | 101 |
Winners | 30 | 18 |
%Winners | 49% | 29% |
Both Oliel and Ejupovic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Oliel and Ejupovic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Oliel played 4 games more than Ejupovic. The Israeli scored 30 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Ejupovic scored 18 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Oliel | Ejupovic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 0 |
Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
1st in | 36/54 | 24/54 |
%1st in | 67% | 44% |
1st pts | 30/36 | 18/24 |
%1st pts | 83% | 75% |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 19/30 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 63% |
Oliel didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Ejupovic also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Oliel won 83% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Ejupovic won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Oliel | Ejupovic |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/4 | 4/7 |
% Converted | 75% | 57% |
Conceded | 3 | 5 |
Saved | 2 | 5 |
% Saved | 67% | 100% |
Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Israeli broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Israeli lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Elmar broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Elmar was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
Oliel | |||
Q1 Gima |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 61-50 | 61-50 | |
Total points | 111 | 111 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 49% | 49% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 36/54 | 36/54 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 30/36 | 30/36 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Ejupovic | |||
Q1 Andrei Dumitru |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 62-39 | 62-39 | |
Total points | 101 | 101 | |
Winners | 18 | 18 | |
%Winners | 29% | 29% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 24/54 | 24/54 | |
% 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
1st pts | 18/24 | 18/24 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – Zdenek KolarKolar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Lukas RosolRosol (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Petros TsitsipasTsitsipas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Sumit NagalNagal (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolae FrunzaFrunza – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ErlerErler – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Stefan PalosiPalosi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Yan BondarevskiyBondarevskiy (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (1-0) – H2H and prediction