Tennys Sandgren and Gijs Brouwer will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Columbus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tennys Sandgren who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tennys Sandgren is the pick to win this match.
Tennys Sandgren -> 1.44
Gijs Brouwer -> 2.79
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tennys Sandgren vs. Gijs Brouwer
There is no head to head record between Tennys Sandgren and Gijs Brouwer since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Tennys Sandgren
Ranked no. 102, Tennys reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexis Galarneau 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Sandgren had a good straight sets win against Galarneau (6-3 6-2). During the match, Sandgren scored 56 points vs Galarneau’s 32. Tennys was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sandgren managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tennys Sandgren was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 96% (24/25) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Galarneau 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Sandgren has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (324-234). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sandgren has a compiled 56-36 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Tennys has a composed 9-20 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2016. See his history.
Gijs Brouwer
Ranked no. 399, the Dutch got to the 2nd round after defeating Yusuke Takahashi 6-1 7-67, Alexander Sarkissian 6-4 6-2 and Darian King 7-61 6-0.
In the 1st round, Brouwer had a good straight sets win against King (7-61 6-0). During the match Brouwer scored 78 points vs King’s 61. The Dutch was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Brouwer bagged 3 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Gijs Brouwer lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Brouwer put 71% of his first serves in, winning 67% (35/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (7/21) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke King 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Brouwer’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Trimbach and M25 Champaign.
The Dutch has a compiled 36-16 win-loss record in 2021, 12-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sandgren | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 57 |
| Pts | 56-32 | 218-165 |
| Total Points | 88 | 383 |
| Winners | 24 | 116 |
| %Winners | 43% | 53% |
Sandgren played 1 match while Brouwer competed in 3 matches. Brouwer started his run from the qualifications while Sandgren had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Sandgren has played 4 set(s) less than Brouwer (2 vs 6). Therefore, Sandgren played 40 games less than Brouwer. Tennys scored 24 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch scored 116 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sandgren | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 162/207 |
| %1st in | 58% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 24/25 | 116/162 |
| %1st pts | 96% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 15/45 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 33% |
Sandgren managed to score 9 aces . Brouwer struck 17 aces (5.7 per match). Sandgren won 96% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Brouwer won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sandgren | Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 14 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 14/26 |
| % Converted | 43% | 54% |
| Conceded | 1 | 20 |
| Saved | 1 | 14 |
| % Saved | 100% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Sandgren broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Sandgren quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. Brouwer broke his opponents 14 times with a 54% conversion rate. Gijs conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sandgren | |||
| R1 Galarneau |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 56-32 | 56-32 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 25/43 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/25 | 24/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 13/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Brouwer | |||||
| Q1 Takahashi |
Q3 Sarkissian |
R1 King |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-67 | 6-4 6-2 | 7-61 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 | 19 | 57 | |
| pts | 83-62 | 57-42 | 78-61 | 218-165 | |
| Total points | 145 | 99 | 139 | 383 | |
| Winners | 48 | 33 | 35 | 116 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | 45% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | 3 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 68/85 | 42/49 | 52/73 | 162/207 | |
| % 1st in | 80% | 86% | 71% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 48/68 | 33/42 | 35/52 | 116/162 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 79% | 67% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/17 | 2/7 | 7/21 | 15/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 35% | 29% | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/7 | 6/11 | 14/26 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 57% | 55% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 1 | 11 | 20 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 0/1 | 8/11 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 0% | 73% | 148% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
WWLLWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Columbus Challenger
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Dayne KellyKelly (6-4 0-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Max PurcellPurcell – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-3 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex BoltBolt – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (7-64 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Evan KingKing – Jeff WolfWolf (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
