
Yannick Hanfmann and Kamil Majchrzak will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Szczecin Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 3:00 pm on CENTRAL COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.48
Yannick Hanfmann -> 2.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yannick Hanfmann vs. Kamil Majchrzak
There is no head to head record between Yannick Hanfmann and Kamil Majchrzak since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Yannick Hanfmann
Ranked no. 132, Hanfmann got to the semifinal after beating Hugo Gaston 3-6 6-3 6-3, Marco Cecchinato 6-3 4-6 7-62 and Pawel Cias 6-2 7-5.
In the quarter, Yannick had a good straight sets win against Cias (6-2 7-5). During the match, Hanfmann scored 75 points vs Cias’s 57. Yannick was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hanfmann fired 3 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Yannick Hanfmann lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Hanfmann put 70% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Cias 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Yannick started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 2 set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Hanfmann has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (234-140). 12-8 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Hanfmann has a composed140-65 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Hanfmann’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Bastad.
Yannick has a composed 16-19 win-loss record in 2021, 12-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Kamil Majchrzak
Ranked no. 139, Majchrzak reached the semifinal after beating Andrea Pellegrino 6-3 7-67, Roberto Carballes Baena 6-3 6-2 and Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune 7-65 6-1.
In the quarter, Kamil had a good straight sets win against Vitus Nodskov Rune (7-65 6-1). During the match Majchrzak scored 83 points vs Vitus Nodskov Rune’s 67. The Pole was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Majchrzak was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Kamil Majchrzak conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 7 break points. Furthermore, Majchrzak put 60% of his first serves in, winning 63% (34/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (23/36) on the 2nd serve. Kamil broke Vitus Nodskov Rune twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Majchrzak started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Majchrzak’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Nottingham 2 Challenger.
The Pole has an overall 30-17 win-loss record in 2021, 15-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hanfmann | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 79 | 59 |
| Pts | 267-234 | 234-198 |
| Total Points | 501 | 432 |
| Winners | 112 | 101 |
| %Winners | 42% | 43% |
Both Hanfmann and Majchrzak played 3 matches. At the moment, Yannick Hanfmann lost 2 sets while Kamil Majchrzak hasn’t conceded a set so far. Hanfmann has played 2 sets more than Majchrzak (8 vs 6). Therefore, Hanfmann played 20 games more than Majchrzak. The German scored 112 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole fired 101 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hanfmann | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 3.7 | 3 |
| 1st in | 165/243 | 149/249 |
| %1st in | 68% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 112/165 | 101/149 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 41/78 | 56/100 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 56% |
Hanfmann managed to score 11 aces (3.7 per match). Majchrzak blasted 9 aces (3 per match). Hanfmann won 68% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hanfmann | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 8 |
| Converted | 13/22 | 8/22 |
| % Converted | 59% | 36% |
| Conceded | 26 | 20 |
| Saved | 18 | 18 |
| % Saved | 69% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 2 |
Hanfmann broke his opponents 13 times with a 59% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Majchrzak broke his opponents 8 times with a 36% conversion rate. Majchrzak conceded his serve twice and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hanfmann | |||||
| R1 Gaston |
R2 Cecchinato |
1/4 Cias |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 4-6 7-62 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 32 | 20 | 79 | |
| pts | 88-87 | 104-90 | 75-57 | 267-234 | |
| Total points | 175 | 194 | 132 | 501 | |
| Winners | 36 | 48 | 28 | 112 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 46% | 37% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 61/96 | 64/90 | 40/57 | 165/243 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 71% | 70% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 36/61 | 48/64 | 28/40 | 112/165 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 75% | 70% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/35 | 17/26 | 9/17 | 41/78 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 65% | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 2/4 | 5/11 | 13/22 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 50% | 45% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 4 | 6 | 26 | |
| Saved | 11/16 | 3/4 | 4/6 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 75% | 67% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
| Majchrzak | |||||
| R1 Pellegrino |
R2 Carballes Baena |
1/4 Vitus Nodskov Rune |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-67 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 | 20 | 59 | |
| pts | 76-70 | 75-61 | 83-67 | 234-198 | |
| Total points | 146 | 136 | 150 | 432 | |
| Winners | 30 | 37 | 34 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 49% | 41% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 0 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 45/77 | 50/82 | 54/90 | 149/249 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 61% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 30/45 | 37/50 | 34/54 | 101/149 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 74% | 63% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 15/32 | 23/36 | 56/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 47% | 64% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/9 | 2/7 | 8/22 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 33% | 29% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 | 7 | 20 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 10/10 | 7/7 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 100% | 100% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWWLW
LLLWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Szczecin Challenger
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Pawel CiasCias (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Andre Goransson/Nathaniel LammonsGoransson/Nathaniel Lammons – Szymon Walkow/Jan ZielinskiWalkow/Jan Zielinski (6-74 6-3 10-0) – See score progression
- Santiago Gonzalez/Andres MolteniGonzalez/Andres Molteni – Sadio Doumbia/Fabien ReboulDoumbia/Fabien Reboul (3-6 6-4 10-5) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (7-6(5) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction











