Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Kamil Majchrzak will clash against each other in the quarter of the Szczecin Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 5:00 pm on CENTRAL COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune is the pick to win this match.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune -> 1.78
Kamil Majchrzak -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune vs. Kamil Majchrzak
This will be the 2nd time that Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune and Kamil Majchrzak play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Majchrzak (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Majchrzak won 3-6 6-4 6-2 in the 1st round in the Tulln Challenger back in September 2021.
Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune
Ranked no. 136 (career-high), Holger got to the quarter after defeating Taro Daniel 6-3 7-5 and Pablo Andujar 6-1 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Dane had a good straight sets win against Andujar (6-1 6-1). During the match, Vitus Nodskov Rune scored 52 points vs Andujar’s 21. Holger was pretty aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vitus Nodskov Rune recorded 2 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Holger Vitus Nodskov Rune was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (17/21) of his 1st serve and 85% (11/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Holger broke Andujar 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Vitus Nodskov Rune started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 61% of the points he played.
Vitus Nodskov Rune has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 68% of his matches (96-45). 41-16 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Vitus Nodskov Rune has a composed74-33 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title in the Biella 7 Challenger where he overcame Marco Trungelliti in the final 6-3 5-7 7-6(5) and in the San Marino Challenger where he overcame Orlando Luz in the final 1-6 6-2 6-3 and in the Verona Challenger where he defeated Nino Serdarusic in the final 6-4 6-2.
The Dane has a composed 57-19 win-loss record in 2021, 41-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Vitus Nodskov Rune has never competed in this tournament before.
Kamil Majchrzak
Ranked no. 139, Kamil reached the quarter after beating Andrea Pellegrino 6-3 7-67 and Roberto Carballes Baena 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Kamil had a good straight sets win against Carballes Baena (6-3 6-2). During the match Majchrzak scored 75 points vs Carballes Baena’s 61. Majchrzak was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Majchrzak blasted 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Kamil Majchrzak conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 10 break points. Furthermore, Majchrzak put 61% of his first serves in, winning 74% (37/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. Kamil broke Carballes Baena 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Majchrzak started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to win 54% of the points he played.
The Pole’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Nottingham 2 Challenger.
The Pole has a compiled 29-17 win-loss record in 2021, 14-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 39 |
| Pts | 117-74 | 151-131 |
| Total Points | 191 | 282 |
| Winners | 45 | 67 |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both Vitus Nodskov Rune and Majchrzak played 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vitus Nodskov Rune and Majchrzak have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Vitus Nodskov Rune played 4 games less than Majchrzak. Vitus Nodskov Rune scored 45 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Majchrzak managed to score 67 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 62/97 | 95/159 |
| %1st in | 64% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 45/62 | 67/95 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 24/35 | 33/64 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 52% |
Vitus Nodskov Rune managed to score 4 aces (2 per match). Majchrzak managed to score 9 aces (4.5 per match). Vitus Nodskov Rune won 73% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vitus Nodskov Rune | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 6 |
| Converted | 9/11 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 82% | 40% |
| Conceded | 7 | 13 |
| Saved | 5 | 11 |
| % Saved | 71% | 85% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Vitus Nodskov Rune broke his opponents 9 times with a 82% conversion rate. Holger lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Kamil broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Kamil conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vitus Nodskov Rune | ||||
| R1 Daniel |
R2 Andujar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 14 | 35 | |
| pts | 65-53 | 52-21 | 117-74 | |
| Total points | 118 | 73 | 191 | |
| Winners | 28 | 17 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 33% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/63 | 21/34 | 62/97 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 62% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 28/41 | 17/21 | 45/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 81% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 11/13 | 24/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 85% | 69% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/6 | 9/11 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 83% | 82% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 0 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 0/0 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | – | 36% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Majchrzak | ||||
| R1 Pellegrino |
R2 Carballes Baena |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-67 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 | 39 | |
| pts | 76-70 | 75-61 | 151-131 | |
| Total points | 146 | 136 | 282 | |
| Winners | 30 | 37 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 49% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/77 | 50/82 | 95/159 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 61% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 30/45 | 37/50 | 67/95 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 74% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 15/32 | 33/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 47% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/9 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 33% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 | 13 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 10/10 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 100% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pawel CiasCias – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
