Franco Agamenone and Igor Sijsling will play each other in the semifinal of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Franco Agamenone is the pick to win this match.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.533
Igor Sijsling -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Igor Sijsling
There is no head to head record between Franco Agamenone and Igor Sijsling since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Franco Agamenone
Ranked no. 330, Agamenone got to the semifinal after beating Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo 6-3 6-3, Geoffrey Blancaneaux 7-5 6-4 and Michael Geerts 5-7 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter against Geerts, The Argentine recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-5 6-3). During the match, Agamenone scored 113 points vs Geerts’s 105. Franco was very aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Regarding the service games, Agamenone made 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve 5 times and he saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 73% of his first serves in, winning 66% (54/82) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (12/30) on the 2nd serve. Agamenone broke Geerts 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Argentine started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 1 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Agamenone has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 64% of his matches (266-149). 45-12 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Agamenone has a compiled238-134 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Cairo,M15 Monastir,M25 Most,M25 Montauban,Bresse and M25 Casinalbo.
The Argentine has a composed 66-17 win-loss record in 2021, 45-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
Igor Sijsling
Ranked no. 338, the Dutch reached the semifinal after beating Daniel Siniakov 6-4 6-3, Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida 6-2 2-6 3-2 ret. and Kaichi Uchida 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter, Sijsling had a good straight sets win against Uchida (7-5 6-3). During the match Sijsling scored 73 points vs Uchida’s 59. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Sijsling struck 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Igor Sijsling lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sijsling put 70% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the 2nd serve. Sijsling broke Uchida 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
The Dutch has an aggregate 12-15 win-loss record in 2021, 8-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | Sijsling |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 73 | 61 |
| Pts | 256-223 | 223-185 |
| Total Points | 479 | 408 |
| Winners | 111 | 84 |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% |
Both Agamenone and Sijsling played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Franco Agamenone surrendered 1 set, while Igor Sijsling conceded 1 set. Agamenone has played 1 set(s) less than Sijsling (7 vs 8). However, it’s interesting to notice that Agamenone played 12 games more than Sijsling. The Argentine scored 111 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Sijsling recorded 84 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | Sijsling |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 0.7 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 172/235 | 125/202 |
| %1st in | 73% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 111/172 | 84/125 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 29/63 | 43/77 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 56% |
Agamenone bagged 2 aces (0.7 per match). Sijsling blasted 13 aces (4.3 per match). Agamenone won 65% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Sijsling won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | Sijsling |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 17 | 12 |
| Converted | 17/32 | 12/27 |
| % Converted | 53% | 44% |
| Conceded | 26 | 22 |
| Saved | 16 | 16 |
| % Saved | 62% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 6 |
The Argentine broke his opponents 17 times with a 53% conversion rate. Franco lost his serve 10 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Sijsling broke his opponents 12 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | |||||
| R1 Sanchez-Izquierdo |
R2 Blancaneaux |
1/4 Geerts |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 7-5 6-4 | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 33 | 73 | |
| pts | 64-50 | 79-68 | 113-105 | 256-223 | |
| Total points | 114 | 147 | 218 | 479 | |
| Winners | 28 | 29 | 54 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% | 48% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/53 | 49/70 | 82/112 | 172/235 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 70% | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 28/41 | 29/49 | 54/82 | 111/172 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 59% | 66% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/12 | 12/21 | 12/30 | 29/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 57% | 40% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 7 | 17 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/12 | 7/12 | 17/32 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 42% | 58% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | 18 | 26 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 1/4 | 13/18 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 25% | 72% | 49% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |
| Sijsling | |||||
| R1 Siniakov |
R2 Pucinelli De Almeida |
1/4 Uchida |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-2 2-6 3-2 ret. | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 | 21 | 61 | |
| pts | 66-50 | 84-76 | 73-59 | 223-185 | |
| Total points | 116 | 160 | 132 | 408 | |
| Winners | 21 | 30 | 33 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 36% | 45% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 9 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 32/59 | 45/74 | 48/69 | 125/202 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 61% | 70% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 30/45 | 33/48 | 84/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 67% | 69% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/27 | 13/29 | 11/21 | 43/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 45% | 52% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/12 | 4/9 | 12/27 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 33% | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 | 6 | 22 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 8/11 | 4/6 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 73% | 67% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWWL
Tennis Scores in Prague 3 Challenger
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Michael GeertsGeerts (5-7 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Igor SijslingSijsling – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-76 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Igor SijslingSijsling (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
