Uladzimir Ignatik and Zsombor Piros will face off in the 1st round of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.71
Uladzimir Ignatik -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Uladzimir Ignatik vs. Zsombor Piros
There is no head to head record between Uladzimir Ignatik and Zsombor Piros since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Uladzimir Ignatik
Ranked no. 379, the Belarussian reached the 1st round after defeating Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin 6-0 6-3 and Elmar Ejupovic 7-64 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Ignatik defeated Ejupovic (7-64 2-6 6-4). During the match, Ignatik scored 104 points vs Ejupovic’s 99. The Belarussian was very aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ignatik bagged 13 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Uladzimir Ignatik lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Ignatik put 61% of his first serves in, winning 78% (49/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (16/40) on the 2nd serve. Uladzimir broke Ejupovic 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Uladzimir started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Ignatik has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (352-273). 23-15 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ignatik has a compiled 170-116 record in the last years on clay.
Uladzimir’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Bucharest and M25 Wroclaw.
Uladzimir has an aggregate 23-19 win-loss record in 2021, 23-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2016. See his history.
Zsombor Piros
Ranked no. 398, Zsombor got to the 1st round after beating Martin Cuevas 2-6 6-3 7-5 and Oriol Roca Batalla 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Hungarian had a good straight sets win against Roca Batalla (6-3 6-1). During the match Piros scored 59 points vs Roca Batalla’s 46. Zsombor was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Piros struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Zsombor Piros conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Piros put 59% of his first serves in, winning 78% (25/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Piros broke Roca Batalla 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zsombor started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Hungarian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Doboj and M25 Grodzisk Mazowiecki.
Zsombor has an overall 29-10 win-loss record in 2021, 23-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ignatik | Piros |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 45 |
| Pts | 163-137 | 151-132 |
| Total Points | 300 | 283 |
| Winners | 74 | 64 |
| %Winners | 45% | 42% |
Both Ignatik and Piros played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Uladzimir Ignatik lost 1 set, while Zsombor Piros dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Ignatik and Piros have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Ignatik played 1 game more than Piros. The Belarussian scored 74 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Piros blasted 64 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ignatik | Piros |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 4 |
| 1st in | 91/153 | 94/152 |
| %1st in | 59% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 74/91 | 64/94 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 24/62 | 30/58 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 52% |
Ignatik struck 18 aces (9 per match). Piros scored 8 aces (4 per match). Ignatik won 81% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Piros won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ignatik | Piros |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 9 |
| Converted | 8/18 | 9/15 |
| % Converted | 44% | 60% |
| Conceded | 9 | 21 |
| Saved | 4 | 16 |
| % Saved | 44% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Uladzimir broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Ignatik conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded. Zsombor broke his opponents 9 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Hungarian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ignatik | ||||
| Q1 Fco. Vidal Azorin |
Q3 Ejupovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 7-64 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 31 | 46 | |
| pts | 59-38 | 104-99 | 163-137 | |
| Total points | 97 | 203 | 300 | |
| Winners | 25 | 49 | 74 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 47% | 45% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 13 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/50 | 63/103 | 91/153 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 61% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 49/63 | 74/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 78% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 16/40 | 24/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 40% | 39% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 3/7 | 8/18 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 43% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 3/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 43% | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Piros | ||||
| Q1 Cuevas |
Q3 Roca Batalla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 16 | 45 | |
| pts | 92-86 | 59-46 | 151-132 | |
| Total points | 178 | 105 | 283 | |
| Winners | 39 | 25 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 62/98 | 32/54 | 94/152 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 59% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 39/62 | 25/32 | 64/94 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 78% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 11/22 | 30/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 50% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/6 | 9/15 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 67% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 6 | 21 | |
| Saved | 10/15 | 6/6 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLLLLLLW Tennis Scores in Prague 3 Challenger
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Nick ChappellChappell (6-4 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (7-5 4-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matija PecoticPecotic – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (7-66 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Alexander RitschardRitschard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johannes HaerteisHaerteis – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Miljan ZekicZekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Matteo DonatiDonati (0-0) – H2H and prediction
