Johan Nikles and Jonathan Mridha will play each other in the qualifications of the Warsaw Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on KORT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Johan Nikles who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Johan Nikles is the pick to win this match.
Johan Nikles -> 1.44
Jonathan Mridha -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Johan Nikles vs. Jonathan Mridha
There is no head to head record between Johan Nikles and Jonathan Mridha since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Johan Nikles
Ranked no. 409 (career-high), the Swiss got to the qualifications after beating Lucas Gerch 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, Nikles had a good straight sets win against Gerch (6-4 7-5). During the match, Nikles scored 88 points vs Gerch’s 75. Johan was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nikles couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Johan Nikles lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Nikles put 62% of his first serves in, winning 67% (33/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the 2nd serve. Johan broke Gerch 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Nikles has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (206-144). 28-11 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nikles has an overall134-87 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Johan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Majadahonda and M15 Genova.
Nikles has an overall 30-17 win-loss record in 2021, 28-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Warsaw Challenger
The Swiss has never competed in this tournament before.
Jonathan Mridha
Ranked no. 562, the Swede got to the qualifications after defeating David Poljak 2-6 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications against Poljak, Mridha recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 6-2). During the match Mridha and Poljak scored the same amount of points (77). However, the world no. 409 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Jonathan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Mridha bagged 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jonathan Mridha lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Mridha put 56% of his first serves in, winning 75% (33/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (15/35) on the 2nd serve. Mridha broke Poljak 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Mridha’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Frederiksberg.
Mridha has a composed 28-12 win-loss record in 2021, 18-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nikles | Mridha |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 26 |
| Pts | 88-75 | 77-77 |
| Total Points | 163 | 154 |
| Winners | 33 | 33 |
| %Winners | 38% | 43% |
Both Nikles and Mridha played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jonathan Mridha surrendered 1 set while Johan Nikles hasn’t lost a set so far. Nikles has played 1 set(s) less than Mridha (2 vs 3). Therefore, Nikles played 4 games less than Mridha. The Swiss scored 33 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Swede managed to score 33 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nikles | Mridha |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 49/79 | 44/79 |
| %1st in | 62% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 33/49 | 33/44 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 15/35 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 43% |
Nikles didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Mridha struck 4 aces . Nikles won 67% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Mridha won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nikles | Mridha |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 33% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 |
| Saved | 7 | 4 |
| % Saved | 78% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Nikles broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Johan lost his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Mridha broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Swede conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nikles | |||
| Q1 Gerch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 88-75 | 88-75 | |
| Total points | 163 | 163 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 49/79 | 49/79 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 33/49 | 33/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Mridha | |||
| Q1 Poljak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 77-77 | 77-77 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 44/79 | 44/79 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 33/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/35 | 15/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLLW
L
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Nicolas JarryJarry (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Alexander ErlerErler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher HeymanHeyman – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ZielinskiZielinski – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Jonathan MridhaMridha (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas CatarinaCatarina – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Julian LenzLenz (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Orlando LuzLuz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
