Christopher Heyman and Daniel Michalski will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Warsaw Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on KORT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christopher Heyman who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christopher Heyman is the pick to win this match.
Christopher Heyman -> 1.57
Daniel Michalski -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christopher Heyman vs. Daniel Michalski
There is no head to head record between Christopher Heyman and Daniel Michalski since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Christopher Heyman
Ranked no. 399, Christopher got to the qualifications after defeating Patrik Niklas-Salminen 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Heyman had a good straight sets win against Niklas-Salminen (6-1 6-3). During the match, Heyman scored 57 points vs Niklas-Salminen’s 35. The Belgian was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Heyman scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Christopher Heyman was very effective on serve to win 79% (26/33) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Christopher broke Niklas-Salminen 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Heyman has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 68% of his matches (236-113). 23-11 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Heyman has a composed106-54 win-loss record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Belgian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya and M25 Wetzlar.
Christopher has a composed 25-16 win-loss record in 2021, 23-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Warsaw Challenger
Christopher has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Michalski
Ranked no. 448, the Pole reached the qualifications after defeating Wojciech Marek 7-62 6-1.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Marek (7-62 6-1). During the match Michalski scored 67 points vs Marek’s 46. Michalski was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Michalski couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Daniel Michalski lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Michalski put 59% of his first serves in, winning 68% (25/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Marek 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The Pole’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Antalya and M15 Cairo.
Daniel has an overall 25-18 win-loss record in 2021, 25-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Heyman | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 |
| Pts | 57-35 | 67-46 |
| Total Points | 92 | 113 |
| Winners | 26 | 25 |
| %Winners | 46% | 37% |
Both Heyman and Michalski played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Heyman and Michalski have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Heyman played 4 games less than Michalski. The Belgian scored 26 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Michalski bagged 25 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Heyman | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 33/47 | 37/63 |
| %1st in | 70% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 25/37 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 17/26 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 65% |
Heyman fired 1 ace . Michalski didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Heyman won 79% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Michalski won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Heyman | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 57% | 57% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Belgian broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Christopher pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Michalski broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Heyman | |||
| Q1 Niklas-Salminen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 57-35 | 57-35 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 33/47 | 33/47 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Michalski | |||
| Q1 Marek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-46 | 67-46 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/63 | 37/63 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Nicolas JarryJarry (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Alexander ErlerErler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher HeymanHeyman – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ZielinskiZielinski – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Jonathan MridhaMridha (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas CatarinaCatarina – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Julian LenzLenz (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Orlando LuzLuz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
