Uladzimir Ignatik and Elmar Ejupovic will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Prague 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Uladzimir Ignatik who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Uladzimir Ignatik is the pick to win this match.
Uladzimir Ignatik -> 1.69
Elmar Ejupovic -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Uladzimir Ignatik vs. Elmar Ejupovic
There is no head to head record between Uladzimir Ignatik and Elmar Ejupovic since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Uladzimir Ignatik
Ranked no. 376, Uladzimir reached the qualifications after beating Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin 6-0 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Belarussian had a good straight sets win against Fco. Vidal Azorin (6-0 6-3). During the match, Ignatik scored 59 points vs Fco. Vidal Azorin’s 38. Uladzimir was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ignatik fired 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Uladzimir Ignatik lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Ignatik put 56% of his first serves in, winning 89% (25/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (8/22) on the 2nd serve. Ignatik broke Fco. Vidal Azorin 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Ignatik has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (351-273). 22-15 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ignatik has an aggregate 169-116 record in the last years on clay.
The Belarussian’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Bucharest and M25 Wroclaw.
Ignatik has a composed 22-19 win-loss record in 2021, 22-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague 3 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2016. See his history.
Elmar Ejupovic
Ranked no. 400, Ejupovic got to the qualifications after beating Jiri Jenicek 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Jenicek (6-2 6-1). During the match Ejupovic scored 60 points vs Jenicek’s 35. Ejupovic was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Ejupovic recorded 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic was quite efficient on serve to win 82% (27/33) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ejupovic broke Jenicek 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Ejupovic’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Grenoble,M25 Trimbach and M15 Troisdorf.
The Bosnian has a compiled 25-13 win-loss record in 2021, 17-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ignatik | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 |
| Pts | 59-38 | 60-35 |
| Total Points | 97 | 95 |
| Winners | 25 | 27 |
| %Winners | 42% | 45% |
Both Ignatik and Ejupovic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ignatik and Ejupovic have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (15). Ignatik scored 25 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Ejupovic bagged 27 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ignatik | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 28/50 | 33/50 |
| %1st in | 56% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 27/33 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 9/17 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 53% |
Ignatik struck 5 aces . Ejupovic recorded 7 aces . Ignatik won 89% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Ejupovic won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ignatik | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 45% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Belarussian broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Belarussian surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Bosnian broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Elmar was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Ignatik | |||
| Q1 Fco. Vidal Azorin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-38 | 59-38 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 28/50 | 28/50 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 8/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ejupovic | |||
| Q1 Jenicek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-35 | 60-35 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 27/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Nick ChappellChappell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Miljan ZekicZekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev – Matija PecoticPecotic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tiago CacaoCacao – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Alex RybakovRybakov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
