Roberto Carballes Baena and Nicolas Jarry will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 6th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nicolas Jarry who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nicolas Jarry is the pick to win this match.
Nicolas Jarry -> 1.83
Roberto Carballes Baena -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roberto Carballes Baena vs. Nicolas Jarry
This will be the 6th time that Roberto Carballes Baena and Nicolas Jarry fight against each other. The head to head is 3-2 for Carballes Baena (see full H2H stats), 3-2 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Carballes Baena won 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(6) in the 1st round in Rio de janiero back in 2019.
Roberto Carballes Baena
Ranked no. 97, the Spaniard reached the 2nd round after beating Nicolas Kicker 6-4 7-63.
In the 1st round, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Kicker (6-4 7-63). During the match, Carballes Baena scored 97 points vs Kicker’s 84. Carballes Baena was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Carballes Baena scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Roberto Carballes Baena lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Carballes Baena put 64% of his first serves in, winning 66% (38/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. Roberto broke Kicker 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
Carballes Baena has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (417-282). 24-16 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Carballes Baena has a composed 375-230 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Roberto’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Belgrade Challenger.
Carballes Baena has a composed 27-21 win-loss record in 2021, 24-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Carballes Baena has never competed in this tournament before.
Nicolas Jarry
Ranked no. 262, Nicolas got to the 2nd round after defeating Lukas Klein 1-6 7-65 7-66.
In the 1st round against Klein, The Chilean recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-65 7-66).-108) than Klein. In fact, the world no. 97 won 108 points vs Klein’s. That means that Jarry was more focused during the important points. The Chilean was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Jarry struck 7 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Nicolas Jarry lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Jarry put 58% of his first serves in, winning 67% (50/75) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (27/54) on the 2nd serve. The Chilean broke Klein once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
The Chilean’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Salinas Challenger and the Salinas 2 Challenger.
Nicolas has a composed 25-12 win-loss record in 2021, 14-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Carballes Baena | Jarry |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 33 |
| Pts | 97-84 | 108-127 |
| Total Points | 181 | 235 |
| Winners | 38 | 50 |
| %Winners | 39% | 46% |
Both Carballes Baena and Jarry played 1 match. At the moment, Nicolas Jarry conceded 1 set while Roberto Carballes Baena hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Carballes Baena has played 1 set(s) less than Jarry (2 vs 3). Therefore, Carballes Baena played 10 games less than Jarry. Carballes Baena scored 38 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Nicolas made 50 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Carballes Baena | Jarry |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 7 |
| 1st in | 58/91 | 75/129 |
| %1st in | 64% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 38/58 | 50/75 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 27/54 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 50% |
Carballes Baena recorded 1 ace . Jarry also made 7 aces . Carballes Baena won 66% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Jarry won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Carballes Baena | Jarry |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 1 |
| Converted | 4/15 | 1/4 |
| % Converted | 27% | 25% |
| Conceded | 9 | 13 |
| Saved | 6 | 10 |
| % Saved | 67% | 77% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Spaniard broke his opponent 4 times with a 27% conversion rate. Roberto dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Jarry broke his opponent once with a 25% conversion rate. The Chilean conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.
| Carballes Baena | |||
| R1 Kicker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 97-84 | 97-84 | |
| Total points | 181 | 181 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 58/91 | 58/91 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 38/58 | 38/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 15/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/15 | 4/15 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Jarry | |||
| R1 Klein |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 7-65 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 108-127 | 108-127 | |
| Total points | 235 | 235 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 75/129 | 75/129 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 50/75 | 50/75 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/54 | 27/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 77% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLLW
LLLWWWWWLL Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (6-2 6-70 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Lukas KleinKlein (1-6 7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Julian LenzLenz – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (5-7 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Pablo AndujarAndujar (5-7 7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Julien CagninaCagnina – Mischa ZverevZverev (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Evan FurnessFurness (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Jelle SelsSels (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Julian LenzLenz – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Nicolas JarryJarry (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
