![Prediction And Head To Head Riccardo Bonadio Vs. Nerman Fatic Ubbvypsr3g Prediction and head to head Riccardo Bonadio vs. Nerman Fatic](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Riccardo-Bonadio-vs.-Nerman-Fatic-ubBvypsR3g.jpg)
Riccardo Bonadio and Nerman Fatic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 9:00 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.84
Riccardo Bonadio -> 1.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Riccardo Bonadio vs. Nerman Fatic
This will be the 3rd time that Riccardo Bonadio and Nerman Fatic square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Bonadio (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Bonadio won 7-5 1-6 6-1 in the semifinal in Italy F34 (Santa Margherita Di Pula) back in 2018.
Riccardo Bonadio
Ranked no. 267 (career-high), Bonadio got to the 2nd round after defeating Lorenzo Giustino 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Giustino, Riccardo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Bonadio and Giustino scored the same amount of points (87). However, the world no. 267 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bonadio made 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Riccardo Bonadio lost the serve 5 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Bonadio put 59% of his first serves in, winning 65% (36/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (16/38) on the 2nd serve. Riccardo broke Giustino 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Bonadio has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 52% of his matches (106-96). 20-21 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Bonadio has an aggregate88-80 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Bonadio has a compiled 21-22 win-loss record in 2021, 20-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Verona Challenger
Bonadio has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
Ranked no. 329, the Bosnian got to the 2nd round after beating Julian Ocleppo 3-0 ret., Petros Chrysochos 6-75 6-3 6-3 and Matteo Viola 6-0 6-1.
In the 1st round, Fatic had a good straight sets win against Viola (6-0 6-1). During the match Fatic scored 62 points vs Viola’s 36. Fatic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic made 6 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Nerman Fatic was quite efficient on serve to win 83% (20/24) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fatic broke Viola 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Nerman’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Prijedor.
Nerman has an overall 24-16 win-loss record in 2021, 24-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Bonadio | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
Tot Games | 30 | 47 |
Pts | 87-87 | 188-140 |
Total Points | 174 | 328 |
Winners | 36 | 59 |
%Winners | 41% | 31% |
Bonadio played 1 match while Fatic competed in 3 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Bonadio had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Riccardo Bonadio conceded 1 set, while Nerman Fatic dropped 1 set. Bonadio has played 4 set(s) less than Fatic (3 vs 7). Therefore, Bonadio played 17 games less than Fatic. Riccardo scored 36 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman recorded 59 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Bonadio | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 8 |
Avg per match | 4 | 2.7 |
1st in | 55/93 | 86/137 |
%1st in | 59% | 63% |
1st pts | 36/55 | 59/86 |
%1st pts | 65% | 69% |
2nd pts | 16/38 | 31/51 |
%2nd pts | 42% | 61% |
Bonadio recorded 4 aces . Fatic made 8 aces (2.7 per match). Bonadio won 65% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Bonadio | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 15 |
Converted | 6/13 | 15/30 |
% Converted | 46% | 50% |
Conceded | 6 | 7 |
Saved | 1 | 3 |
% Saved | 17% | 43% |
Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Riccardo broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 17% of the break points that he conceded. Fatic broke his opponents 15 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
Bonadio | |||
R1 Giustino |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 87-87 | 87-87 | |
Total points | 174 | 174 | |
Winners | 36 | 36 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 55/93 | 55/93 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 36/55 | 36/55 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 16/38 | 16/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 1/6 | 1 | |
Saved % | 17% | 17% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Fatic | |||||
Q1 Ocleppo |
Q3 Chrysochos |
R1 Viola |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-0 ret. | 6-75 6-3 6-3 | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 3 | 31 | 13 | 47 | |
pts | 16-8 | 110-96 | 62-36 | 188-140 | |
Total points | 24 | 206 | 98 | 328 | |
Winners | 2 | 37 | 20 | 59 | |
%Winners | 13% | 34% | 32% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
1st in | 3/8 | 59/94 | 24/35 | 86/137 | |
% 1st in | 38% | 63% | 69% | 63% | |
1st pts | 2/3 | 37/59 | 20/24 | 59/86 | |
% 1st pts | 67% | 63% | 83% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 3/5 | 22/35 | 6/11 | 31/51 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 63% | 55% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 7 | 6 | 15 | |
Converted | 2/2 | 7/15 | 6/13 | 15/30 | |
Converted % | 100% | 47% | 46% | 50% | |
Conceded | 0 | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 2/6 | 1/1 | 3 | |
Saved % | – | 33% | 100% | 133% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Matija PecoticPecotic (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Matteo ViolaViola (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Marco BortolottiBortolotti (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (6-73 6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-3 7-60) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Gabriel Roveri Sidney/Marcelo ZormannRoveri Sidney/Marcelo Zormann – Nicolo Pozzani/Alessio ZanottiPozzani/Alessio Zanotti (7-61 6-1) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-4 6-74 7-66) – See score progression
- Paolo LorenziLorenzi – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco FortiForti – Fletcher ScottScott (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Orlando LuzLuz (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (1-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Filippo BaldiBaldi (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Jesper De JongDe Jong (6-3 7-6(0)) – See score progression
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Matija PecoticPecotic (6-2 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Matteo ViolaViola (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Orlando LuzLuz (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Pavel KotovKotov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction