H2H, PREDICTION Riccardo Bonadio vs Nerman Fatic | Verona Challenger odds, preview, pick

PREVIEW. Verona Challenger. Bonadio and Fatic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger. See the prediction, H2H stats, odds, and preview of their next match

Prediction and head to head Riccardo Bonadio vs. Nerman Fatic

Riccardo Bonadio and Nerman Fatic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Verona Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 9:00 pm on CAMPO CENTRALE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.

See updated oddsAs per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.84
Riccardo Bonadio -> 1.96

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

See Updated Draw

Prediction and head to head Riccardo Bonadio vs. Nerman Fatic

This will be the 3rd time that Riccardo Bonadio and Nerman Fatic square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Bonadio (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.

The last time that they played, Bonadio won 7-5 1-6 6-1 in the semifinal in Italy F34 (Santa Margherita Di Pula) back in 2018.

Riccardo Bonadio

Ranked no. 267 (career-high), Bonadio got to the 2nd round after defeating Lorenzo Giustino 4-6 6-4 6-4.

In the 1st round against Giustino, Riccardo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Bonadio and Giustino scored the same amount of points (87). However, the world no. 267 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.

Regarding the service games, Bonadio made 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Riccardo Bonadio lost the serve 5 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Bonadio put 59% of his first serves in, winning 65% (36/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (16/38) on the 2nd serve. Riccardo broke Giustino 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).

Bonadio has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 52% of his matches (106-96). 20-21 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Bonadio has an aggregate88-80 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.

Bonadio has a compiled 21-22 win-loss record in 2021, 20-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Verona Challenger

Bonadio has never competed in this tournament before.

Bonadio
Verona Challenger
Bonadio's Record

Nerman Fatic

Ranked no. 329, the Bosnian got to the 2nd round after beating Julian Ocleppo 3-0 ret., Petros Chrysochos 6-75 6-3 6-3 and Matteo Viola 6-0 6-1.

In the 1st round, Fatic had a good straight sets win against Viola (6-0 6-1). During the match Fatic scored 62 points vs Viola’s 36. Fatic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.

Talking about serving, Fatic made 6 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Nerman Fatic was quite efficient on serve to win 83% (20/24) of his 1st serve and 55% (6/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fatic broke Viola 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).

Nerman’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Prijedor.

Nerman has an overall 24-16 win-loss record in 2021, 24-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Fatic
Verona Challenger
Fatic's Record
Tennis

H2H Performance in the tournament

R.Bonadio
N.Fatic
2h:33
2h:33
Time on court​
!
3h:53
3h:53
!
2h:33
2h:33
Last match​
1h:00
1h:00
1
1
Match played
!
3
3
30
30
Games Played​
47
47
3
3
Set played​​
7
7
87
87
Total points​
188
188
87
87
Avg point​
62.7
62.7
36
36
Winners
59
59
36
36
Avg Winners​
19.7
19.7
41%
41%
Ratio winners
31%
31%
-- Serve --
4
4
Aces
8
8
4
4
Avg Aces
2.7
2.7
2
2
Double Faults
5
5
2
2
Avg Double Faults
1.7
1.7
36/55
36/55
1st won total​
59/86
59/86
65%
65%
1st won %
69%
69%
16/38
16/38
2nd won total​
31/51
31/51
42%
42%
2nd won %
!
61%
61%
-- Break Points --
6/13
6/13
BP won
15/30
15/30
6/13
6/13
Avg BP won
5/10
5/10
46%
46%
Won
50%
50%
6
6
Conceded
7
7
6
6
Avg Conceded
2.3
2.3
5
5
Broken
4
4
!
5
5
Avg Broken
1.3
1.3
1
1
Saved
3
3

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Bonadio Fatic
Match played 1 3
Tot Set 3 7
Tot Games 30 47
Pts 87-87 188-140
Total Points 174 328
Winners 36 59
%Winners 41% 31%

Bonadio played 1 match while Fatic competed in 3 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Bonadio had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Riccardo Bonadio conceded 1 set, while Nerman Fatic dropped 1 set. Bonadio has played 4 set(s) less than Fatic (3 vs 7). Therefore, Bonadio played 17 games less than Fatic. Riccardo scored 36 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman recorded 59 winners (31%).

Serve Performance

Serve Bonadio Fatic
Aces 4 8
Avg per match 4 2.7
1st in 55/93 86/137
%1st in 59% 63%
1st pts 36/55 59/86
%1st pts 65% 69%
2nd pts 16/38 31/51
%2nd pts 42% 61%

Bonadio recorded 4 aces . Fatic made 8 aces (2.7 per match). Bonadio won 65% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Bonadio Fatic
Won 6 15
Converted 6/13 15/30
% Converted 46% 50%
Conceded 6 7
Saved 1 3
% Saved 17% 43%
Times Broken 5 4

Riccardo broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 17% of the break points that he conceded. Fatic broke his opponents 15 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.

Bonadio
R1
Giustino
Total
Score 4-6 6-4 6-4
Tot Set 3 3
Tot Games 30 30
pts 87-87 87-87
Total points 174 174
Winners 36 36
%Winners 41% 41%
SERVE
Aces 4 4
Double Faults 2 2
1st in 55/93 55/93
% 1st in 59% 59%
1st pts 36/55 36/55
% 1st pts 65% 65%
2nd pts 16/38 16/38
% 2nd pts 42% 42%
Breaks
Won 6 6
Converted 6/13 6/13
Converted % 46% 46%
Conceded 6 6
Saved 1/6 1
Saved % 17% 17%
Times Broken 5 5
Fatic
Q1
Ocleppo
Q3
Chrysochos
R1
Viola
Total
Score 3-0 ret. 6-75 6-3 6-3 6-0 6-1
Tot Set 1 3 2 6
Tot Games 3 31 13 47
pts 16-8 110-96 62-36 188-140
Total points 24 206 98 328
Winners 2 37 20 59
%Winners 13% 34% 32% 31%
SERVE
Aces 1 1 6 8
Double Faults 0 5 0 5
1st in 3/8 59/94 24/35 86/137
% 1st in 38% 63% 69% 63%
1st pts 2/3 37/59 20/24 59/86
% 1st pts 67% 63% 83% 69%
2nd pts 3/5 22/35 6/11 31/51
% 2nd pts 60% 63% 55% 61%
Breaks
Won 2 7 6 15
Converted 2/2 7/15 6/13 15/30
Converted % 100% 47% 46% 50%
Conceded 0 6 1 7
Saved 0/0 2/6 1/1 3
Saved % 33% 100% 133%
Times Broken 0 4 0 4

Head 2 Head

Win Loss
Bonadio
LWLWWWWLWW
Fatic
WLLLWLWWWL
2024 2023 2022
17 - 14
10 - 16
1-3
Hard
3-3
1-1
I Hard
0-0
15-10
Clay
7-12

Tennis Scores in Verona Challenger

See Updated Draw

Upcoming matches in the draw