![Prediction And Head To Head Filip Cristian Jianu Vs. Nick Hardt 0g8grva84s Prediction and head to head Filip Cristian Jianu vs. Nick Hardt](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Filip-Cristian-Jianu-vs.-Nick-Hardt-0g8GRvA84s.jpg)
Filip Cristian Jianu and Nick Hardt will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 7. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nick Hardt who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nick Hardt is the pick to win this match.
Nick Hardt -> 1.54
Filip Cristian Jianu -> 2.41
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Filip Cristian Jianu vs. Nick Hardt
There is no head to head record between Filip Cristian Jianu and Nick Hardt since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Filip Cristian Jianu
Ranked no. 318 (career-high), the Romanian got to the qualifications after beating Lambert Ruland 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Romanian had a good straight sets win against Ruland (6-4 6-2). During the match, Cristian Jianu scored 63 points vs Ruland’s 47. Cristian Jianu was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cristian Jianu fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Filip Cristian Jianu lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Cristian Jianu put 63% of his first serves in, winning 60% (21/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the 2nd serve. Filip broke Ruland 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Cristian Jianu has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 62% of his matches (115-71). 32-17 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Cristian Jianu has a compiled96-53 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
Cristian Jianu’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Cairo and M15 Antalya.
Filip has a compiled 35-22 win-loss record in 2021, 32-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Filip has never competed in this tournament before.
Nick Hardt
Ranked no. 361 (career-high), the Dominican got to the qualifications after beating Evgeny Tyurnev 4-6 6-4 7-63.
In the qualifications against Tyurnev, Nick recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 7-63). During the match Hardt scored 114 points vs Tyurnev’s 100. Nick was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Hardt managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Nick Hardt was very efficient on serve to win 76% (45/59) of his 1st serve and 67% (22/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Hardt broke Tyurnev twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
The Dominican’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya,M25 Belgrade,M25 Marburg and M25 Denia.
The Dominican has an aggregate 38-10 win-loss record in 2021, 29-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Cristian Jianu | Hardt |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 18 | 33 |
Pts | 63-47 | 114-100 |
Total Points | 110 | 214 |
Winners | 21 | 45 |
%Winners | 33% | 39% |
Both Cristian Jianu and Hardt played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nick Hardt lost 1 set while Filip Cristian Jianu hasn’t conceded a set so far. Cristian Jianu has played 1 set(s) less than Hardt (2 vs 3). Therefore, Cristian Jianu played 15 games less than Hardt. Filip scored 21 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Nick recorded 45 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Cristian Jianu | Hardt |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 3 |
Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
1st in | 35/56 | 59/92 |
%1st in | 63% | 64% |
1st pts | 21/35 | 45/59 |
%1st pts | 60% | 76% |
2nd pts | 15/21 | 22/33 |
%2nd pts | 71% | 67% |
Cristian Jianu managed to score 2 aces . Hardt recorded 3 aces . Cristian Jianu won 60% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Hardt won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Cristian Jianu | Hardt |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 2 |
Converted | 5/8 | 2/12 |
% Converted | 63% | 17% |
Conceded | 6 | 4 |
Saved | 4 | 2 |
% Saved | 67% | 50% |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Romanian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Filip dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Nick broke his opponent twice with a 17% conversion rate. The Dominican conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
Cristian Jianu | |||
Q1 Ruland |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 63-47 | 63-47 | |
Total points | 110 | 110 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 35/56 | 35/56 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 21/35 | 21/35 | |
% 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
2nd pts | 15/21 | 15/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Hardt | |||
Q1 Tyurnev |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
pts | 114-100 | 114-100 | |
Total points | 214 | 214 | |
Winners | 45 | 45 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 59/92 | 59/92 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 45/59 | 45/59 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 22/33 | 22/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/12 | 2/12 | |
Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Dayne KellyKelly (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (6-1 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mischa ZverevZverev – Julien CagninaCagnina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo AndujarAndujar – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – Roberto CidCid (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julian LenzLenz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Constant LestienneLestienne (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Evan FurnessFurness (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-0) – H2H and prediction