Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Nerman Fatic will square off in the qualifications of the Cordenons Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on ACQUA DOLOMIA. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.88
Camilo Ugo Carabelli -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Camilo Ugo Carabelli and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Ranked no. 303, Ugo Carabelli reached the qualifications after defeating Rafael Matos 4-6 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications against Matos, Ugo Carabelli recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-2). During the match, Ugo Carabelli scored 102 points vs Matos’s 78. The Argentine was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ugo Carabelli blasted 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Camilo Ugo Carabelli lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ugo Carabelli put 69% of his first serves in, winning 73% (44/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (10/27) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Matos 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Ugo Carabelli has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (145-80). 20-12 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ugo Carabelli has a compiled125-66 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
Ugo Carabelli’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Villa Maria.
Camilo has an aggregate 24-14 win-loss record in 2021, 20-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cordenons Challenger
Camilo has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
Ranked no. 329, Fatic reached the qualifications after defeating Angelo Rossi 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Nerman had a good straight sets win against Rossi (6-1 6-0). During the match Fatic scored 56 points vs Rossi’s 24. Nerman was quite aggressive to blast 15 winners.
About the serving games, Fatic made 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Nerman Fatic was pretty efficient on serve to win 83% (15/18) of his 1st serve and 77% (10/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fatic broke Rossi 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Fatic’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Prijedor.
Nerman has an overall 20-13 win-loss record in 2021, 20-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ugo Carabelli | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 13 |
| Pts | 102-78 | 56-24 |
| Total Points | 180 | 80 |
| Winners | 44 | 15 |
| %Winners | 43% | 27% |
Both Ugo Carabelli and Fatic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Camilo Ugo Carabelli surrendered 1 set while Nerman Fatic hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Ugo Carabelli has played 1 set more than Fatic (3 vs 2). Therefore, Ugo Carabelli played 17 games more than Fatic. Camilo scored 44 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman made 15 winners (27%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ugo Carabelli | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
| 1st in | 60/87 | 18/31 |
| %1st in | 69% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 44/60 | 15/18 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 10/27 | 10/13 |
| %2nd pts | 37% | 77% |
Ugo Carabelli fired 8 aces . Fatic fired 3 aces . Ugo Carabelli won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 37% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 77% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ugo Carabelli | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/15 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 47% | 55% |
| Conceded | 10 | 0 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. Ugo Carabelli surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Nerman broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Bosnian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Ugo Carabelli | |||
| Q1 Matos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 102-78 | 102-78 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 60/87 | 60/87 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 44/60 | 44/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/27 | 10/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Fatic | |||
| Q1 Rossi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 56-24 | 56-24 | |
| Total points | 80 | 80 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 15/18 | 15/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 10/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 77% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWWWWLL
WLLLWLWWWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alejandro GonzalezGonzalez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Filippo BaldiBaldi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Pavel KotovKotov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Antoine HoangHoang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni – Gilles SimonSimon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
