![Prediction And Head To Head Jamie Loeb Vs. En Shuo Liang Q8ydxpqfyc Prediction and head to head Jamie Loeb vs. En Shuo Liang](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Jamie-Loeb-vs.-En-Shuo-Liang-q8ydXPqFyc.jpg)
Jamie Loeb and En Shuo Liang will face off in the quarter of the Charleston for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 pm on Court 9. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is En Shuo Liang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, En Shuo Liang is the pick to win this match.
En Shuo Liang -> 1.7
Jamie Loeb -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jamie Loeb vs. En Shuo Liang
There is no head to head record between Jamie Loeb and En Shuo Liang since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jamie Loeb
Ranked no. 229, Loeb got to the quarter after defeating Whitney Osuigwe 6-3 7-63 and Katrina Scott 6-1 4-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The American defeated Scott (6-1 4-6 6-3). During the match, Loeb scored 100 points vs Scott’s 88. Loeb was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Loeb made 5 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Jamie Loeb was very effective on serve to win 72% (36/50) of her 1st serve and 51% (22/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Loeb broke Scott 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Loeb started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has dropped 1 set in this event to win 55% of the points she played.
Loeb has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 56% of her matches (222-176). 13-10 on clay in 2021. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Loeb has an overall54-48 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the W25 Pelham.
The American has a composed 16-15 win-loss record in 2021, 13-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston
Loeb has never competed in this tournament before.
En Shuo Liang
Ranked no. 244, En reached the quarter after defeating Katarina Jokic 6-2 0-6 6-4 and Allie Kiick 4-6 6-0 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Kiick, Shuo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-0 6-2). During the match Shuo scored 91 points vs Kiick’s 65. Shuo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Shuo made 12 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. En Shuo Liang lost the serve 3 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Shuo put 64% of her first serves in, winning 76% (34/45) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. En broke Kiick 7 times after converting 47% of her break points (7/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Shuo started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
Shuo has an overall 14-16 win-loss record in 2021, 5-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Loeb | Shuo |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
Tot Games | 48 | 48 |
Pts | 182-151 | 177-150 |
Total Points | 333 | 327 |
Winners | 60 | 66 |
%Winners | 33% | 37% |
Both Loeb and Shuo played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jamie Loeb lost 1 set, while En Shuo Liang dropped 2 sets. Loeb has played 1 set(s) less than Shuo (5 vs 6). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (48). Loeb scored 60 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Shuo made 66 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Loeb | Shuo |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 15 |
Avg per match | 3 | 7.5 |
1st in | 89/172 | 95/164 |
%1st in | 52% | 58% |
1st pts | 60/89 | 66/95 |
%1st pts | 67% | 69% |
2nd pts | 40/83 | 29/69 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 42% |
Loeb struck 6 aces (3 per match). Shuo bagged 15 aces (7.5 per match). Loeb won 67% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Shuo won 69% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Loeb | Shuo |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 12 |
Converted | 12/24 | 12/25 |
% Converted | 50% | 48% |
Conceded | 19 | 19 |
Saved | 12 | 11 |
% Saved | 63% | 58% |
Times Broken | 7 | 8 |
Jamie broke her opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. Loeb conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded. Shuo broke her opponents 12 times with a 48% conversion rate. Shuo conceded her serve 8 times and she saved 58% of the break points that she conceded.
Loeb | ||||
R1 Osuigwe |
R2 Scott |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-63 | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 26 | 48 | |
pts | 82-63 | 100-88 | 182-151 | |
Total points | 145 | 188 | 333 | |
Winners | 24 | 36 | 60 | |
%Winners | 29% | 36% | 33% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
1st in | 39/79 | 50/93 | 89/172 | |
% 1st in | 49% | 54% | 52% | |
1st pts | 24/39 | 36/50 | 60/89 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 72% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 18/40 | 22/43 | 40/83 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 51% | 48% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
Converted | 7/12 | 5/12 | 12/24 | |
Converted % | 58% | 42% | 50% | |
Conceded | 11 | 8 | 19 | |
Saved | 6/11 | 6/8 | 12 | |
Saved % | 55% | 75% | 65% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 2 | 7 |
Shuo | ||||
R1 Jokic |
R2 Kiick |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 0-6 6-4 | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 24 | 48 | |
pts | 86-85 | 91-65 | 177-150 | |
Total points | 171 | 156 | 327 | |
Winners | 32 | 34 | 66 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 12 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
1st in | 50/94 | 45/70 | 95/164 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 64% | 58% | |
1st pts | 32/50 | 34/45 | 66/95 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 76% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 18/44 | 11/25 | 29/69 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 44% | 42% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
Converted | 5/10 | 7/15 | 12/25 | |
Converted % | 50% | 47% | 48% | |
Conceded | 11 | 8 | 19 | |
Saved | 6/11 | 5/8 | 11 | |
Saved % | 55% | 63% | 59% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 3 | 8 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Pavel NejedlyNejedly (4-6 6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sumit NagalNagal – Lenny HampelHampel (7-5 4-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kristijan MesarosMesaros – Artem SmirnovSmirnov (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jamie LoebLoeb – En Shuo LiangShuo Liang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hanna ChangChang – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria MateasMateas – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction