Botic Van De Zandschulp and Jiri Lehecka will fight against each other in the quarter of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.69
Jiri Lehecka -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Jiri Lehecka
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Jiri Lehecka since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 126 (career-high), the Dutch got to the quarter after beating Daniel Michalski 6-2 6-3 and Miljan Zekic 6-4 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Botic had a good straight sets win against Zekic (6-4 6-1). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 59 points vs Zekic’s 35. Botic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was pretty efficient on serve to win 96% (22/23) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Botic broke Zekic 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Botic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 63% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 67% of his matches (224-112). 17-7 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has a compiled122-66 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Van De Zandschulp’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Amersfoort Challenger.
Van De Zandschulp has a composed 29-15 win-loss record in 2021, 17-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Van De Zandschulp has never competed in this tournament before.
Jiri Lehecka
Ranked no. 213 (career-high), Jiri reached the quarter after beating Tristan Lamasine 6-3 7-5 and Aleksandar Vukic 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Vukic (6-3 6-4). During the match Lehecka scored 73 points vs Vukic’s 59. Jiri was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Lehecka scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jiri Lehecka was pretty efficient on serve to win 74% (31/42) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Czech broke Vukic twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jiri started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.
Lehecka’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Sharm El Sheikh,M25 Biel,M25 Jablonec nad Nisou and the Tampere Challenger.
The Czech has an overall 45-14 win-loss record in 2021, 25-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 40 |
| Pts | 122-71 | 144-117 |
| Total Points | 193 | 261 |
| Winners | 40 | 62 |
| %Winners | 33% | 43% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Lehecka played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Lehecka have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Van De Zandschulp played 6 games less than Lehecka. Van De Zandschulp scored 40 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech scored 62 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 48/79 | 81/131 |
| %1st in | 61% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 40/48 | 62/81 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 20/31 | 28/50 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 56% |
Van De Zandschulp blasted 10 aces (5 per match). Lehecka managed to score 6 aces (3 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 83% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Lehecka won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 5 |
| Converted | 11/22 | 5/17 |
| % Converted | 50% | 29% |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 40% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponents 11 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Dutch lost his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Lehecka broke his opponents 5 times with a 29% conversion rate. Lehecka conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Michalski |
R2 Zekic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 34 | |
| pts | 63-36 | 59-35 | 122-71 | |
| Total points | 99 | 94 | 193 | |
| Winners | 18 | 22 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 37% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 25/43 | 23/36 | 48/79 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 64% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 18/25 | 22/23 | 40/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 96% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 8/13 | 20/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 62% | 65% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 5/11 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 45% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 0% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Lehecka | ||||
| R1 Lamasine |
R2 Vukic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 19 | 40 | |
| pts | 71-58 | 73-59 | 144-117 | |
| Total points | 129 | 132 | 261 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 39/69 | 42/62 | 81/131 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 68% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 31/39 | 31/42 | 62/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 74% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 13/20 | 28/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 65% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 2/9 | 5/17 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 22% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 2/2 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 100% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWLWWW
LWWWWLLWWW Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
